ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025
Machine learning to detect Alzheimer's disease with data on drugs and diagnoses.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A machine learning model to simplify recognition of patients with atrial fibrillation based on diagnostic codes in Swedish primary health care.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of a machine learning prediction model for short-term mortality in patients with diabetes or hyperglycemia at emergency department admission.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction model for post-ERCP cholangitis in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: a retrospective multicenter study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntegrating machine learning with medical records offers potential for early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD), enabling timely interventions.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning in constructing a predictive model for AD, designed to predict AD with data up to three years before diagnosis. Using clinical data, including prior diagnoses and medical treatments, we sought to enhance sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic procedures. A second aim was to identify the most important factors in the machine learning models, as these may be important predictors of AD.
designThe study employed Stochastic Gradient Boosting, a machine learning method, to identify diagnoses predictive of AD using primary healthcare data. The analyses were stratified by sex and age groups.
settingThe study included individuals within Region Stockholm, Sweden, using medical records from 2010 to 2022.
participantsThe study analyzed clinical data for individuals over the age of 40. Patients with an AD diagnosis (ICD-10-SE codes F00 or G30) during 2010-2012 were excluded to ensure prospective modeling. In total, AD was identified in 3,407 patients aged 41-69 years and 25,796 patients aged over 69. MEASUREMENTS: The machine learning model ranked predictive diagnoses, with performance assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Known and novel predictors were evaluated for their contribution to AD risk.
resultsAUC values ranged from 0.748 (women aged 41-69) to 0.816 (women over 69), with men across age groups falling within this range. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.73 to 0.79 and 0.66 to 0.79, respectively, across age and gender groups. Negative predictive values were consistently high (≥0.954), while positive predictive values were lower (0.199-0.351). Additionally, we confirmed known risk factors as predictors and identified novel predictors that warrant further investigation. Key predictors included medical observations, cognitive symptoms, antidepressant treatment, visit frequency, and vitamin B12/folic acid treatment.
conclusionsMachine learning applied to clinical data shows promise in predicting AD, with robust model performance across age and sex groups. The findings confirmed known risk factors, such as depression and vitamin B12 deficiency, while also identifying novel predictors that may guide future research. Clinically, this approach could enhance early detection and risk stratification, facilitating timely interventions and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.