Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40057374›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2025

Toward the use of nanopore RNA sequencing technologies in the clinic: challenges and opportunities.

Xanthi-Lida Katopodi, Oguzhan Begik, Eva Maria Novoa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. FTO depletion does not alter mbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Epitranscriptomic alterations induced by environmental toxins: implications for RNA modifications and disease.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xanthi-Lida KatopodiCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8555-777X
Oguzhan BegikCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8663-4586
Eva Maria NovoaCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9367-6311

Funding

AECC Foundation LABE211658NOVOEuropean Union's Horizon Europe 101072892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA molecules have garnered increased attention as potential clinical biomarkers in recent years. While short-read sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction have been the primary methods for quantifying RNA abundance, they typically fail to capture critical post-transcriptional regulatory elements, such as RNA modifications, which are often dysregulated in disease contexts. A promising cutting-edge technique sequencing method that addresses this gap is direct RNA sequencing, offered by Oxford Nanopore Technologies, which can simultaneously capture both RNA abundance and modification information. The rapid advancements in this platform, along with growing evidence of dysregulated RNA species in biofluids, presents a compelling clinical opportunity. In this review, we discuss the challenges and the emerging opportunities for the adoption of nanopore RNA sequencing technologies in the clinic, highlighting their potential to revolutionize personalized medicine and disease monitoring.

Indexed as

Nanopore SequencingRNASequence Analysis, RNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNanoporesPrecision MedicineRNA

Identifiers

PMID40057374
PMCPMC11890063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.