ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2025
Medical Interpreters' Experiences With Patients Who Are Near End-of-Life and Their Family Members.
Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Language barriers and patient safety in supportive care: Two case reports bridging system-level gaps".Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Performance of Check In for Exchange of Clinical and Key Information: A Communication Guide to Facilitate Pre-Encounter Huddles with Medical Interpreters Prior to Conversations Around Serious Illness.Palliative medicine reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextMedical interpreters play a critical role in communicating with patients and families with non-English language preference (NELP), previously referred to as limited English proficiency , near the end-of-life (EOL) but often receive minimal education about providing this type of care.
objectivesTo understand interpreter experiences with providing services for patients near the end of life and needs for professional support and training in EOL care.
methodsA 60 question survey, was distributed to 1,660 medical interpreters at two hospitals and one interpreter service company. The survey included questions about participant characteristics, examined interpreter experiences, self-efficacy responding to EOL symptoms and EOL concerns, comfort levels, educational needs, racial discrimination, and barriers to effective interpretation for patients who are near EOL.
resultsMedical interpreters (n = 162) generally report high self-efficacy in interpreting conversations about EOL care but have lower scores regarding the communication and decision-making subscale compared to symptom management subscale (Diff = 0.90 (95% CI 0.48-1.32), P < 0.0001). Many (70.4%) of the interpreters indicated that they never or seldom meet with the patient's medical providers prior to a goals of care meeting and only 52.2% report they are usually or always treated as part of the medical team. Interpreters often received little warning about conversation topics prior to interpreting. Qualitative comments revealed experiences of high emotional distress during and after these conversations. Approximately three quarters of the interpreters indicated they would be interested in receiving education regarding EOL topics. Increased experience as an interpreter was associated with a lower fear of death (r
conclusionAlthough self-efficacy for interpreting EOL conversations is generally high, interpreters desire education about EOL care. Interventions are also needed to address the high emotional toll of interpreting EOL conversations. Education and training about EOL care may help them to not only convey information accurately but also cope with emotional nuances characteristic of these significant conversations, ultimately elevating the quality of care for patients and family members in vulnerable and important moments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.