Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40057249›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2025

Medical Interpreters' Experiences With Patients Who Are Near End-of-Life and Their Family Members.

Joycelyn Howard, Alexia M Torke, Susan E Hickman, Greg Sachs, Sylk Sotto-Santiago, James E Slaven, Denise Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joycelyn HowardIndiana University Health (J.H.), Indiana, USA. Electronic address: jlhowardrn@gmail.com.
Alexia M TorkeIndiana University Center for Aging Research (A.M.T.), Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Susan E HickmanIU School of Nursing (S.E.H.), IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Greg SachsIndiana University Center for Aging Research (G.S.), Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Sylk Sotto-SantiagoDepartment of Medicine (S.S.S.), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
James E SlavenDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science (J.E.S.), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Denise RobinsonNorthern Kentucky University (D.R.), Highland Heights, Kentucky, USA.

Funding

Understanding the needs and experiences of surrogate decision makers caring for SGM individuals with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.K24AG053794 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TORKE, ALEXIA MARY · 2016 to 2025
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG053794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMedical interpreters play a critical role in communicating with patients and families with non-English language preference (NELP), previously referred to as limited English proficiency , near the end-of-life (EOL) but often receive minimal education about providing this type of care.

objectivesTo understand interpreter experiences with providing services for patients near the end of life and needs for professional support and training in EOL care.

methodsA 60 question survey, was distributed to 1,660 medical interpreters at two hospitals and one interpreter service company. The survey included questions about participant characteristics, examined interpreter experiences, self-efficacy responding to EOL symptoms and EOL concerns, comfort levels, educational needs, racial discrimination, and barriers to effective interpretation for patients who are near EOL.

resultsMedical interpreters (n = 162) generally report high self-efficacy in interpreting conversations about EOL care but have lower scores regarding the communication and decision-making subscale compared to symptom management subscale (Diff = 0.90 (95% CI 0.48-1.32), P < 0.0001). Many (70.4%) of the interpreters indicated that they never or seldom meet with the patient's medical providers prior to a goals of care meeting and only 52.2% report they are usually or always treated as part of the medical team. Interpreters often received little warning about conversation topics prior to interpreting. Qualitative comments revealed experiences of high emotional distress during and after these conversations. Approximately three quarters of the interpreters indicated they would be interested in receiving education regarding EOL topics. Increased experience as an interpreter was associated with a lower fear of death (r

conclusionAlthough self-efficacy for interpreting EOL conversations is generally high, interpreters desire education about EOL care. Interventions are also needed to address the high emotional toll of interpreting EOL conversations. Education and training about EOL care may help them to not only convey information accurately but also cope with emotional nuances characteristic of these significant conversations, ultimately elevating the quality of care for patients and family members in vulnerable and important moments.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersFamilyTerminal CareTranslatingAdultFemaleHumansLimited English ProficiencyMaleMiddle AgedSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesCommunicationEnd-of-lifeInterpreterLimited English proficiency and education

Identifiers

PMID40057249
PMCPMC13102252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.