ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2025
Fertility preservation in young breast cancer patients: A nationwide survey on knowledge, attitudes, and practices among breast surgical healthcare providers in China.
Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Existential Vacuum" and Axiological Conflict as Correlates of Cognitive-Affective Dissociation in Medical Staff Attitudes Toward Oncofertility in the Pediatric Population-A Preliminary Report.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Outcomes of a prospective cohort study of PREoperative therapy and supportive care in early & locally advanced breast cancers-PreSCella study.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nursing practice scale for supporting fertility preservation decision-making in women with cancer.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFertility preservation (FP) is a critical concern for young breast cancer (YBC) patients receiving gonadotoxic treatments. Breast surgical healthcare providers (HCPs) play a pivotal role in discussing FP options and facilitating timely referrals. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of breast surgical HCPs in China regarding FP, identify barriers to FP discussions, and examine factors influencing referral practices.
methodsA nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to June 2023 among board-certified breast surgeons and nurses across China using a 24-item questionnaire. Participants were recruited via WeChat through BestOnco, a professional platform for oncology HCPs. The survey assessed FP knowledge, attitudes, clinical practices, and perceived barriers. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with FP referral practices.
resultsA total of 355 valid responses were analyzed. The mean FP knowledge score was 6.05 ± 1.94 (range 0-10), with 49.3 % of HCPs never consulting FP guidelines. While 82.8 % expressed a favorable attitude toward FP, only 42.3 % routinely discussed FP options, and 44.7 % referred patients to reproductive specialists. Major barriers included poor prognosis concerns (87.0 %), treatment urgency (67.9 %), and financial burden (60.0 %). Multivariate analysis revealed that higher FP knowledge (OR = 1.23, p < 0.0001), longer clinical experience (OR = 2.93, p = 0.001), and hospital-based FP integration (OR = 1.83, p < 0.0001) were significant predictors of referral.
conclusionsNotable gaps were identified in FP knowledge, discussions, and referrals among breast surgical HCPs in China. Targeted FP training programs, culturally informed shared decision-making strategies, and oncofertility navigation systems are recommended to enhance FP service delivery and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.