Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40056612›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2025

Distinct impacts of aging on the immune responses to extracellular matrix-based versus synthetic biomaterials.

Mangesh M Kulkarni, Branimir Popovic, Alexis L Nolfi, Clint D Skillen, Bryan N Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mangesh M KulkarniMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Branimir PopovicMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Alexis L NolfiMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Clint D SkillenMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Bryan N BrownMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. Electronic address: brownb@upmc.edu.

Funding

Assessing the Impacts of Aging upon the Macropahge Response to Implantable MaterialsR01AG055564 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BROWN, BRYAN NICKLAUS · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All implanted materials inevitably trigger an acute inflammatory response. The long-term outcome, however, is dependent on the trajectory of this response. This study investigates the effects of aging on the immune response to two commercially available biomaterials. Extracellular matrix-based urinary bladder matrix (UBM) and synthetic polypropylene mesh (PPM) were implanted in young (4 months) and aged (18 months) C57BL/6J mice. Overall, PPM led to a sustained inflammatory response regardless of the age of the mice. In contrast, UBM induced an initial inflammatory response that matured into a pro-regenerative/remodeling response with time, though aged mice exhibited a delayed resolution of inflammation. The PPM-induced response was predominantly pro-inflammatory with consistently higher M1-like macrophage phenotype, whereas the response to UBM was characterized by an anti-inflammatory M2-like phenotype, especially in young mice. RNA sequencing revealed marked age-related differences in gene transcription. At day 7 post-implantation, the young mice with UBM showed a robust upregulation of both pro- and anti-inflammatory pathways as compared to young mice implanted with PPM, however, by day 14, the gene expression profile transitioned into an anti-inflammatory profile. Intriguingly, in aged mice, the response to UBM was distinct with consistent downregulation of inflammatory genes compared to PPM, while the response to PPM in both young and aged animals was largely consistent. Upstream analysis identified cytokines as key drivers of the host response, with IL-4 and IL-13 in young mice, and TNF-α and IL-1β driving chronic inflammation in aged mice. These findings highlight the importance of host age in biomaterial outcome, and the potential of ECM-based materials to mount a favorable response even in the presence of age-related immune dysregulation.

Indexed as

AgingBiocompatible MaterialsExtracellular MatrixAnimalsFemaleInflammationMacrophagesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPolypropylenesSurgical MeshUrinary BladderBiocompatible MaterialsPolypropylenesAgingBiomaterialsHost responseMacrophages

Identifiers

PMID40056612
PMCPMC13373783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.