ArticleBiomaterials2025
Distinct impacts of aging on the immune responses to extracellular matrix-based versus synthetic biomaterials.
Article in Biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunomodulatory Effects of Clinically Used Fat Emulsion to Promote Angiogenesis and Osteogenesis for Bone Repair.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
All implanted materials inevitably trigger an acute inflammatory response. The long-term outcome, however, is dependent on the trajectory of this response. This study investigates the effects of aging on the immune response to two commercially available biomaterials. Extracellular matrix-based urinary bladder matrix (UBM) and synthetic polypropylene mesh (PPM) were implanted in young (4 months) and aged (18 months) C57BL/6J mice. Overall, PPM led to a sustained inflammatory response regardless of the age of the mice. In contrast, UBM induced an initial inflammatory response that matured into a pro-regenerative/remodeling response with time, though aged mice exhibited a delayed resolution of inflammation. The PPM-induced response was predominantly pro-inflammatory with consistently higher M1-like macrophage phenotype, whereas the response to UBM was characterized by an anti-inflammatory M2-like phenotype, especially in young mice. RNA sequencing revealed marked age-related differences in gene transcription. At day 7 post-implantation, the young mice with UBM showed a robust upregulation of both pro- and anti-inflammatory pathways as compared to young mice implanted with PPM, however, by day 14, the gene expression profile transitioned into an anti-inflammatory profile. Intriguingly, in aged mice, the response to UBM was distinct with consistent downregulation of inflammatory genes compared to PPM, while the response to PPM in both young and aged animals was largely consistent. Upstream analysis identified cytokines as key drivers of the host response, with IL-4 and IL-13 in young mice, and TNF-α and IL-1β driving chronic inflammation in aged mice. These findings highlight the importance of host age in biomaterial outcome, and the potential of ECM-based materials to mount a favorable response even in the presence of age-related immune dysregulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.