Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40056560›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2025

pTERT mutational status is associated with survival in stage IV melanoma patients receiving first-line immune therapy.

Philipp Jansen, Wolfgang Galetzka, Carl M Thielmann, Rajmohan Murali, Anne Zaremba, Fabian Standl, Georg Lodde, Inga Möller, Antje Sucker, Annette Paschen and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Philipp JansenDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
Wolfgang GaletzkaInstitute for medical informatics, biometry and epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Carl M ThielmannDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
Rajmohan MuraliDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Anne ZarembaDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
Fabian StandlGraduate Center of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Georg LoddeDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
Inga MöllerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
Antje SuckerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
Annette PaschenDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
Eva HadaschikDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
Selma UgurelDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lisa ZimmerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
Elisabeth LivingstoneDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andreas StangInstitute for medical informatics, biometry and epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Klaus G GriewankDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: Klaus.griewank@uk-essen.de.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTERT promoter mutations are the most prevalent mutations in melanoma. In this study, we investigated clinical characteristics and survival after first line therapies in a cohort of melanoma patients with known TERT promoter (pTERT) mutation status.

methodsSequencing data from 2013 to 2021 covering 29 genes and the pTERT status was assessed and 774 melanomas patients with known pTERT status and clinical data were analyzed. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 374 melanoma patients in AJCC-stage IV who received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI, anti-CTLA4 /anti-PD1 combination therapy or anti-PD1 monotherapy) or targeted therapy (TT) were assessed applying Cox uni-/ multivariable analyses and Kaplan-Meier curves.

resultsThe cohort included 573 cutaneous, 69 mucosal, 37 acral and 95 MUP (melanomas of unknown primary) melanoma patients with a median observational time from first diagnosis to patient death or censoring of 38.5 months. TERT promoter mutations were identified in 476 melanomas (61.5 %). Survival analysis of 374 patients with stage IV disease undergoing first-line systemic therapy (ICI or TT) suggested prolonged PFS and OS for patients with pTERT mutation positive tumors (pTERT(+)). Particularly, pTERT(+) patients receiving anti-CTLA4/anti-PD1 therapy showed mPFS of 14.8 months (95 % CI: 7.1-40.3) and mOS of 105.2 months (95 % CI: 27.6-not reached) compared to pTERT(-) patients with mPFS of 5.5 months (95 % CI: 2.7-10.0) and mOS of 14.7 months (95 % CI: 11.7-24.1).

conclusionsOur findings suggest that presence of a pTERT mutation in melanomas might favor PFS and OS after first line ICI with the greatest improvement after receiving anti-CTLA4 / anti-PD1. If validated in larger prospective studies, pTERT mutation status may be a valuable prognostic marker for stage IV melanoma patients.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaMutationSkin NeoplasmsTelomeraseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPromoter Regions, GeneticBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsTelomeraseTERT protein, humanImmune therapyMelanomaMutational profilingPTERT

Identifiers

PMID40056560
PMCPMC12573089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.