Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40056425›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Body reserves dynamics of suckling ewes across successive production cycles under outdoor and indoor contrasting farming system conditions.

Agnes Nyamiel, Dominique Hazard, Didier Marcon, Christian Durand, Sébastien Douls, Gaetan Bonnafe, Flavie Tortereau, Anne Tesnière, Eliel González-García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic Parameter Estimation for Plasma Biomarkers Associated With Energy Reserves During Critical Physiological Stages in Sheep.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Agnes NyamielUMR1388 GENPHYSE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID 0009-0003-9050-683X
Dominique HazardUMR1388 GENPHYSE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Didier MarconUE0332 Experimental Unit P3R, La Sapinière, INRAE, Osmoy, France.
Christian DurandUE321 Experimental Unit La Fage, INRAE, Saint-Jean-et-Saint-Paul, France.
Sébastien DoulsUE321 Experimental Unit La Fage, INRAE, Saint-Jean-et-Saint-Paul, France.
Gaetan BonnafeUE321 Experimental Unit La Fage, INRAE, Saint-Jean-et-Saint-Paul, France.
Flavie TortereauUMR1388 GENPHYSE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Anne TesnièreUMR868 SELMET, INRAE, CIRAD, Institut Agro Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Eliel González-GarcíaUMR868 SELMET, INRAE, CIRAD, Institut Agro Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9232-1941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body reserves (BR) mobilization (BRM) and accretion (BRA) are crucial biological processes in ruminants that help them manage negative energy balance and adapt to changing environments. The BR dynamics (BRD) is affected by the interplay of key factors such as the farming system (FS) characteristics, physiological stage (PhySt), and parity (Par) or cohort (Coh) of the ewes, as well as litter size (LSi) at lambing and during suckling. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of contrasting FS (intensive, indoor (IND) vs. extensive, outdoor (OUT)) on the BRD of Romane ewes. Two flocks were monitored: 173 ewes in IND and 234 in OUT, belonging to 2 cohorts (Coh17/18). Ewes were monitored for body weight, body condition score (BCS), backfat thickness, back muscle thickness, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), triiodothyronine (T3), and insulin (INS) at 5 key PhySt (Mating, M; mid-pregnancy, P; before-lambing, bL; after-lambing, aL; and weaning, W) in primiparous (PRIM) or multiparous (MULT) ewes during successive production cycles. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models, with a significance threshold set at P ≤ 0.05. There was no isolated effect (P > 0.05) of FS on the BR traits evaluated. However, significant interactions were observed between FS and PhySt and Par (P < 0.001), LSi (P < 0.01), or Coh (P < 0.001) for all BR traits, indicating that FS may influence BR through factors such as feed availability, energy demands, or stress levels across different PhySt. MULT ewes showed better BR recovery than PRIM ewes regardless of FS, suggesting improved metabolic efficiency with maturity. Greater BRM and slower recovery were observed in ewes with larger LSi, regardless of FS, emphasizing the need for tailored nutritional strategies, and Coh18 ewes showed greater capacity to mobilize and rebuild BR than Coh17. BR dynamics were similar in both FS as indicated by comparable levels of BHB (but not NEFA), T3, and BCS around lambing. In both FS, BRM was observed from P until W, and BRA was observed from weaning until the next P. In conclusion, BRD in sheep is strongly shaped by PhySt, and to a lesser extent by environmental factors, influencing FS resilience and productivity. These insights support the importance of improving animal adaptive capacities through BR management to enhance sustainability in diverse FS, particularly in the face of climate variability and rising production costs.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBody Composition3-Hydroxybutyric AcidAnimalsAnimals, SucklingFatty Acids, NonesterifiedFemaleHousing, AnimalLactationPregnancySheep3-Hydroxybutyric AcidFatty Acids, Nonesterifiedbody reservefarming systemmeat sheepphysiological stageplasma metabolites and hormonesresidual feed intake

Identifiers

PMID40056425
PMCPMC12065413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.