ArticleWorld journal of surgery2025
Tray Rationalization in Pediatric Day Surgery: A Sustainable Quality Improvement Project.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClimate change poses a major threat to human health. The decontamination of used surgical equipment has been identified as a "carbon hotspot" in theaters. Surgical tray rationalization, which removes enough instruments to shrink the tray size, has a significant impact on carbon footprint, providing that there is not an increase in individually wrapped instruments used.
methodsUsing the sustainability in quality improvement framework, we rationalized the surgical tray used for pediatric open herniotomies at the Oxford University Hospitals John Radcliffe site. Data on instrument utilization and individually wrapped instruments were prospectively collected. Our tray redesign had no threshold utilization rate for instrument exclusion and focused on removing enough instruments to reduce the tray size. To calculate impact, we used established data on carbon emissions and financial cost and surveyed staff attitudes toward the redesigned tray.
resultsThe tray at baseline included 55 instruments. The tray size was reduced by 50% with the removal of 22 instruments. Following our intervention, the median instrument utilization rate increased from 27% to 74% with no significant increase in individually wrapped instruments. The redesigned tray reduced carbon emissions from 4243 gCO
conclusionsThis quality improvement project shows the impact possible by using an established simple and effective framework that can be replicated by healthcare professionals without a background in planetary health to ensure future surgical tray rationalization efforts that maximize environmental impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.