Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40056394›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2025

Cost Saving Analysis of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Elective Colorectal Surgery in an ERAS Qualified and Training Center.

Elisa Bertocchi, Davide Brunelli, Thomas Squaranti, Diego Campagnola, Sara Camparsi, Roberto Tessari, Nicola Menestrina, Irene Gentile, Lorenza Sanfilippo, Nicoletta De Santis and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elisa BertocchiGeneral Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8671-6493
Davide BrunelliHospital Health Direction, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Thomas SquarantiPlanning and Control, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Diego CampagnolaPlanning and Control, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Sara CamparsiPlanning and Control, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Roberto TessariHospital Pharmacy Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Nicola MenestrinaDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Irene GentileGeneral Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Lorenza SanfilippoSection of Biostatistics, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Nicoletta De SantisSection of Biostatistics, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Massimo GuerrieroSection of Biostatistics, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Giacomo RuffoGeneral Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo ascertain the costs of implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in elective colorectal surgery throughout all perioperative phases in an Italian ERAS Qualified and Training Center.

methodsConsecutive patients who had undergone elective colorectal surgery in 2022, the first year of our facility being an ERAS Qualified Center (n 204; ERAS group), were compared to a control group (n 203; pre-ERAS group) that had undergone elective colorectal surgery in 2017, the last year before the internal ERAS implementation. The primary endpoint was the cost-effectiveness of the ERAS protocol as determined by evaluating perioperative costs. Secondary endpoints were postoperative clinical outcomes.

resultsIn the ERAS group, fewer postoperative complications (p < 0.001), a shorter length of stay (LOS) (p < 0.001), and a decreased 30-day readmission rate (p 0.047) were reported. The mean cost saving for elective colorectal surgery in the ERAS setting was about €3676.73 per patient. The preoperative costs in the ERAS group were 45% higher than in the control group. The intraoperative phase showed a small but significant decrease in costs (-€324.04, SD 1683.81, and p 0.002). The postoperative phase also had a significant decrease in costs (-€3439.30, SD 6903.07, and p < 0.001), which was especially apparent in patients with severe complications.

conclusionsDespite significantly increased costs in the preoperative phase, the ERAS protocol, when highly complied with, may lead to significantly decreased patient pathway costs due to a reduction of postoperative complications, a shorter LOS, and the more targeted use of medication and blood transfusions.

Indexed as

Cost SavingsElective Surgical ProceduresEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansItalyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPerioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective Studiescolorectal surgerycost‐effectivenessERASpreoperative optimization

Identifiers

PMID40056394
PMCPMC11994153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.