Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40056344›Full record

Observational studyJapanese journal of radiology2025

Evaluation of radiology residents' reporting skills using large language models: an observational study.

Natsuko Atsukawa, Hiroyuki Tatekawa, Tatsushi Oura, Shu Matsushita, Daisuke Horiuchi, Hirotaka Takita, Yasuhito Mitsuyama, Ayako Omori, Taro Shimono, Yukio Miki and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Natsuko AtsukawaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Hiroyuki TatekawaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan. htatekawa@omu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8050-4895
Tatsushi OuraDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Shu MatsushitaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Daisuke HoriuchiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Hirotaka TakitaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Yasuhito MitsuyamaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Ayako OmoriDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Taro ShimonoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Yukio MikiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Daiju UedaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLarge language models (LLMs) have the potential to objectively evaluate radiology resident reports; however, research on their use for feedback in radiology training and assessment of resident skill development remains limited. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of LLMs in revising radiology reports by comparing them with reports verified by board-certified radiologists and to analyze the progression of resident's reporting skills over time. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo identify the LLM that best aligned with human radiologists, 100 reports were randomly selected from 7376 reports authored by nine first-year radiology residents. The reports were evaluated based on six criteria: (1) addition of missing positive findings, (2) deletion of findings, (3) addition of negative findings, (4) correction of the expression of findings, (5) correction of the diagnosis, and (6) proposal of additional examinations or treatments. Reports were segmented into four time-based terms, and 900 reports (450 CT and 450 MRI) were randomly chosen from the initial and final terms of the residents' first year. The revised rates for each criterion were compared between the first and last terms using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test.

resultsAmong the three LLMs-ChatGPT-4 Omni (GPT-4o), Claude-3.5 Sonnet, and Claude-3 Opus-GPT-4o demonstrated the highest level of agreement with board-certified radiologists. Significant improvements were noted in Criteria 1-3 when comparing reports from the first and last terms (Criteria 1, 2, and 3; P < 0.001, P = 0.023, and P = 0.004, respectively) using GPT-4o. No significant changes were observed for Criteria 4-6. Despite this, all criteria except for Criteria 6 showed progressive enhancement over time.

conclusionLLMs can effectively provide feedback on commonly corrected areas in radiology reports, enabling residents to objectively identify and improve their weaknesses and monitor their progress. Additionally, LLMs may help reduce the workload of radiologists' mentors.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyLanguageRadiologyHumansLarge Language ModelsLarge language modelRadiology reportResidentTraining

Identifiers

PMID40056344
PMCPMC12204868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.