ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025
Defining histamine H2 receptor antagonist response in critically ill patients with heart failure: a machine learning cluster analysis.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent studies showed histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) exposure was associated with reduced mortality in heart failure (HF) patients. However, specific HF patients who are sensitive to H2RAs exposure or not are yet to be further defined.
aimThis study aimed to identify HF patient characteristics that may benefit from H2RAs exposure.
methodNeural network-based variational autoencoders and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) clustering methods were employed to classify the critically ill patients with HF exposed to H2RAs based on Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III and IV databases. Binary logistic and multivariable Cox regression analysis based on propensity score matching (PSM) were employed to estimate the association between H2RAs exposure of each cluster and all-cause mortality of included patients.
resultsA total of 9,585 H2RAs users among 23,855 included HF patients were identified into four clusters according to GMM clustering: cluster 1 (combined with acute kidney failure, septic shock, and pneumonia), cluster 2 (combined with atrial fibrillation), cluster 3 (combined with coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or had higher urine output), and cluster 4 (co-administered with calcium-antagonists). The cluster 3 patients were significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality compared with non-H2RAs users after PSM, which were further validated in 14,280 HF patients from the large multi-center electronic intensive care unit Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD).
conclusionHistamine H2 receptor antagonist exposure was more sensitive in HF patients who were combined with CAD. Furthermore, male HF patients or those with higher urine output were also sensitive to H2RAs exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40056335What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.