ArticleEndocrine2025
Diagnostic value of deep learning of multimodal imaging of thyroid for TI-RADS category 3-5 classification.
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of malignancy and metastasis of thyroid cancer by combined feature sets through advanced machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based classification of thyroid nodules using uncertainty-aware multi-modal ultrasound imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThyroid nodules classified within the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TI-RADS) category 3-5 are typically regarded as having varying degrees of malignancy risk, with the risk increasing from TI-RADS 3 to TI-RADS 5. While some of these nodules may undergo fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy to assess their nature, this procedure carries a risk of false negatives and inherent complications. To avoid the need for unnecessary biopsy examination, we explored a method for distinguishing the benign and malignant characteristics of thyroid TI-RADS 3-5 nodules based on deep-learning ultrasound images combined with computed tomography (CT).
methodsThyroid nodules, assessed as American College of Radiology (ACR) TI-RADS category 3-5 through conventional ultrasound, all of which had postoperative pathology results, were examined using both conventional ultrasound and CT before operation. We investigated the effectiveness of deep-learning models based on ultrasound alone, CT alone, and a combination of both imaging modalities using the following metrics: Area Under Curve (AUC), sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV). Additionally, we compared the diagnostic efficacy of the combined methods with manual readings of ultrasound and CT.
resultsA total of 768 thyroid nodules falling within TI-RADS categories 3-5 were identified across 768 patients. The dataset comprised 499 malignant and 269 benign cases. For the automatic identification of thyroid TI-RADS category 3-5 nodules, deep learning combined with ultrasound and CT demonstrated a significantly higher AUC (0.930; 95% CI: 0.892, 0.969) compared to the application of ultrasound alone AUC (0.901; 95% CI: 0.856, 0.947) or CT alone AUC (0.776; 95% CI: 0.713, 0.840). Additionally, the AUC of combined modalities surpassed that of radiologists'assessments using ultrasound alone AUCmean (0.725；95% CI:0.677, 0.773), CT alone AUCmean (0.617; 95% CI:0.564, 0.669). Deep learning method combined with ultrasound and CT imaging of thyroid can allow more accurate and precise classification of nodules within TI-RADS categories 3-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40056264What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.