ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Condensed low-dose total skin electron beam therapy for mycosis fungoides: an institutional retrospective review and subgroup analysis of patients with large cell transformation.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is an effective treatment option for mycosis fungoides (MF) with proven palliative effects and reduced toxicity. Presented is an institutional analysis of survival/response rate and quality of life for MF patients with subgroup analysis of those possessing pathologic large cell transformation (LCT). This is a single institutional retrospective review of patients with mycosis fungicides treated from 2014 to 2023 with low-dose TSEBT. All patients received 12 Gy in 6 fractions every other day with the modified Stanford technique, with boosts to shadowed sites between treatments, completed in 2 weeks. Outcomes evaluated included clinical response, duration of and time to response, patient-reported quality of life, and physician-scored disease burden. Forty-six patients were included in the study, 28 male and 18 female, with a median age 66.5 (range 32.7-90.6). Stage IB was most common at the time of TSEBT (41.3%). Median follow up was 44.5 months. The overall response rate was 91.3% (52.2% partial response, 19.6% complete and near complete response). The median duration of response was 8.2 months (range, 6.1-28.7), and the median time to best response was 3.5 months (range, 2.7-5.6). Quality of life (QOL) and disease burden continued to show significant benefit after TSEBT (p<0.001). In a subgroup analysis, 18 patients (39.1%) were found to have large cell transformation (LCT) at diagnosis. LCT was associated with higher presenting stage prior to TSEBT (p=0.016) and a better response to treatment (p=0.040). However, median duration of response was only 7.4 months in the patients with LCT vs. 39.4 months in the patients without (p=0.003). Condensed Low-dose TSEBT is a convenient treatment with favorable clinical outcomes and low toxicities in patients with mycosis fungoides. Patients with LCT may have shorter duration of treatment response. Further studies are warranted to validate this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.