ReviewAmerican journal of hematology2025
Classification of Myelodysplastic, Myeloproliferative, and Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: The Past, Present, and Future.
Review in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Spectrum of Movement Disorders in Hematological Malignancies: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Clinical Phenotypes, Mechanisms, and Outcomes.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Pooled it
- Isolated del(5q) with myeloproliferative driver mutations: A systematic review of published cases and clinical implications.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Review
- Validation of clinicopathologic features of a genetic myelodysplastic syndrome classification in an independent cohort.Journal of hematopathology · 2025Article
- Navigating the Landscape of Exosomal microRNAs: Charting Their Pivotal Role as Biomarkers in Hematological Malignancies.Non-coding RNA · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the recent publication of new classification systems of hematopoietic neoplasms, understanding how recognition of disease entities has occurred over time and the subsequent development of formal disease classifications is of importance. This review focuses on the early recognition of myeloid disorders, especially chronic myeloid disorders, and how clinical observations became associated with specific cytologic, histologic, immunophenotypic, and eventually genetic features. This combined approach to disease classification is of particular importance in the evaluation of chronic myeloid neoplasms and has resulted in the definition of clinicopathologic disease entities that allow for more customized treatment approaches. The constant incorporation of ever-increasing information related to these disorders illustrates that disease classification is a constantly evolving process that requires constant updates as we strive to better understand the disorders we diagnose and treat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.