Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40056007›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025

Can invitation systems increase participation in preventive health screening among adolescents?-an evaluation of a state-wide intervention in Germany using a difference-in-differences analysis of claims data.

Iryna Iashchenko, Wiebke Schüttig, Philip Bammert, Udo Schneider, Jacob Spallek, Petra Rattay, Sven Schneider, Irene Moor, Claudia R Pischke, Leonie Sundmacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Iryna IashchenkoChair of Health Economics, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Wiebke SchüttigChair of Health Economics, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Philip BammertChair of Health Economics, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Udo SchneiderTechniker Krankenkasse, Hamburg, Germany.
Jacob SpallekDepartment of Public Health, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6312-034X
Petra RattayDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Sven SchneiderCenter for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health (CPD), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6438-1971
Irene MoorInstitute of Medical Sociology, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Claudia R PischkeInstitute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Leonie SundmacherChair of Health Economics, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

DFGFOR2723 384210238German Research FoundationGerman Research Foundation 384210238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Germany, routine screenings are used to monitor the health and development of children and adolescents, enabling timely discovery and treatment of health issues. One such screening, called J1, is recommended for adolescents aged 12-14 years, but participation is only 43%. In the state of Bavaria, a lack of awareness is the main reason cited for not attending. 'Your Ticket to J1' was an invitation system implemented across the state to inform adolescents about the screening. Our study investigated whether this intervention increased J1 participation and if its effects varied by family socioeconomic position (SEP). We used pseudonymized data from a large statutory health insurer from 2016 to 2018 and containing 267 650 observations. To investigate the effect of the intervention, we employed a difference-in-differences analysis at the individual level. Assuming parallel trends at the state level, we compared J1 participation rates between Bavaria and other German states before and after the intervention. We additionally stratified analyses by SEP. The intervention led to an increase in J1 participation by about 1%. In the stratified regressions, the effect size was larger for children from families with a lower SEP. J1 participation increased by about 4% among adolescents whose primary insured parent had the lowest occupational status. A state-wide invitation system had a small but statistically significant positive impact on J1 participation and might reduce socioeconomic inequities in healthcare utilization. Informing adolescents about J1 appears to increase participation, particularly among those from families with a lower SEP.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CarePreventive Health ServicesAdolescentChildFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID40056007
PMCPMC11967887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.