SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Safety and Efficacy of Mavacamten and Aficamten in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and food effect of HRS-1893, a cardiac myosin inhibitor, in healthy subjects.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: state of the art on diagnosis and current therapeutic approach.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2026Review
- Mavacamten alleviates sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome by modulating the PI3K/AKT/autophagy axis: a spatial transcriptomic-guided investigation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Mavacamten in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: National Insights on Access and Safety Profile From Real-World Data.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Observational
- Incidence and Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation and Systolic Dysfunction in Patients Receiving Mavacamten for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Multicenter Study.Journal of cardiac failure · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten in Children and Adolescents With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Study Design and Rationale of CEDAR-HCM.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Article
- Mavacamten in the Treatment of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: from Pathophysiology To Real World Data.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Sarcomere to Clinic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Trials and Future Challenges.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Review
- Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2025Article
- Pharmacologic therapies for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The past, the present, and the future.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiac myosin inhibitors were recently developed to address the underlying pathophysiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and to improve symptoms and quality of life. In this review, we evaluated the pharmacologic profile and clinical outcomes for mavacamten and aficamten, 2 cardiac myosin inhibitors investigated in symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND
resultsUsing a systematic search, 10 clinical trials with safety and efficacy data for either drug in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) and nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were included. Additionally, we included data from regulatory agencies. Both drugs demonstrated substantial benefit in reducing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradients improved by -45 mm Hg or better), symptom burden (placebo-corrected New York Heart Association class improvement ≥1 of at least 30%), and cardiac biomarkers (geometric mean ratio of 0.2 for N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) while improving exercise parameters (improved placebo-corrected peak oxygen consumption of at least 1.4 to 1.8 mL/kg per minute) in patients with oHCM. Both drugs were generally well-tolerated, although patients on mavacamten had higher rates of treatment interruption (partly protocol-driven, 8.7% versus 0.5%, respectively, in oHCM) due to left ventricular ejection fraction reduction, atrial fibrillation (11.5 versus 4.1 per 100 patient-years, respectively, in oHCM), and heart failure (1.7 versus 0.0 per 100 patient-years, respectively, in oHCM) compared with aficamten. These comparisons are limited by a shorter exposure duration to aficamten, and longer follow-up is needed. The data in nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are derived from phase II trials, with phase III trials ongoing.
conclusionsMavacamten and aficamten represent effective medications for the treatment of symptomatic oHCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.