Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40055815›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

Postnatal Depression Beyond 12 Months: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Elsie Hellyer, Katrina Nash, Ellie Jones, Alice Sitch, Jelena Jankovic, Giles Berrisford, Amelia Casey, Christine MacArthur

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elsie HellyerAintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Katrina NashOxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5204-9688
Ellie JonesDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2552-8322
Alice SitchNIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7727-4497
Jelena JankovicBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Perinatal Mental Health Service, Birmingham, UK.
Giles BerrisfordBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Perinatal Mental Health Service, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6850-0947
Amelia CaseyDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Christine MacArthurDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0434-2158

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care ResearchNIHR Applied Health Research Collaboration West MidlandsNIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, postnatal depression (PND) has been considered as depression in the first year after giving birth, although it has been argued that the 12-month cut-off may be somewhat arbitrary. Specialist perinatal mental health services in England have recently been extended to include women in their second year postpartum; however, there is no good estimate for the prevalence of PND beyond the first year. This review aimed to obtain the best estimate of the prevalence of PND in the second postpartum year. Eligible studies were those that assessed PND and provided a point prevalence using a validated screening tool or clinical diagnosis at least once beyond the first 12 months in women over the age of 18 years in any country. Studies were excluded if they only included women who were already depressed or had elevated depression scores at baseline. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsychINFO were searched in January 2021 (and updated in February 2024) for studies that included the prevalence of PND beyond the first 12 postnatal months. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane's ROBINS-I and Risk of Bias 2 tools. Prevalence data were combined in meta-analysis using prediction intervals (PIs). A total of 6340 papers were found, and of these, 32 studies including 57210 participants across 18 countries met the inclusion criteria and were meta-analysed. The prevalence of PND in the second year (13-24 months) was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12%, 17%; 95% PI 4%, 30%) and similar to that in the first year, 16% (95% CI 14%, 19%; 95% PI 6%, 31%). Despite considerable heterogeneity, common in meta-analysis of prevalence studies, findings show that a similar proportion of women experience PND in the second year after birth.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumFemaleHumansPrevalencepostnatal carepostnatal depressionprevalencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40055815
PMCPMC11889294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.