Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40055783›Full record

ReviewStem cell research & therapy2025

Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells from perinatal sources: biological facts, molecular biomarkers, and therapeutic promises.

Mohammed Z Allouh, Syed Faizan Ali Rizvi, Ali Alamri, Yusuf Jimoh, Salma Aouda, Zakaria H Ouda, Mohammad I K Hamad, Mick Perez-Cruet, G Rasul Chaudhry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohammed Z AllouhDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, P. O. Box: 15551, Al Ain, UAE. m_allouh@uaeu.ac.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0105-6260
Syed Faizan Ali RizviOU-WB Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA.
Ali AlamriOU-WB Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA.
Yusuf JimohOU-WB Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA.
Salma AoudaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Zakaria H OudaDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, P. O. Box: 15551, Al Ain, UAE.
Mohammad I K HamadDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, P. O. Box: 15551, Al Ain, UAE.
Mick Perez-CruetOU-WB Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA.
G Rasul ChaudhryOU-WB Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA. chaudhry@oakland.edu.

Funding

Efficacy of NSCs in an EAE model of MSR16NS129748 · NINDS · OAKLAND UNIVERSITY · PI CHAUDHRY, G. RASUL · 2022 to 2025
$600k
College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University grant # G00004697, fund # 12M176NINDS NIH HHS R16 NS129748United Arab Emirates University UPAR grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from perinatal tissue sources has gained attention due to their availability and lack of significant ethical or moral concerns. These cells have a higher proliferative capability than adult MSCs and less immunogenic or tumorigenesis risk than fetal and embryonic stem cells. Additionally, they do not require invasive isolation methods like fetal and adult MSCs. We reviewed the main biological and therapeutic aspects of perinatal MSCs in a three-part article. In the first part, we revised the main biological features and characteristics of MSCs and the advantages of perinatal MSCs over other types of SCs. In the second part, we provided a detailed molecular background for the main biomarkers that can be used to identify MSCs. In the final part, we appraised the therapeutic application of perinatal MSCs in four major degenerative disorders: degenerative disc disease, retinal degenerative diseases, ischemic heart disease, and neurodegenerative diseases. In conclusion, there is no single specific molecular marker to identify MSCs. We recommend using at least two positive markers of stemness (CD29, CD73, CD90, or CD105) and two negative markers (CD34, CD45, or CD14) to exclude the hematopoietic origin. Moreover, utilizing perinatal MSCs for managing degenerative diseases presents a promising therapeutic approach. This review emphasizes the significance of employing more specialized progenitor cells that originated from the perinatal MSCs. The review provides scientific evidence from the literature that applying these progenitor cells in therapeutic procedures provides a greater regenerative capacity than the original primitive MSCs. Finally, this review provides a valuable reference for researchers exploring perinatal MSCs and their therapeutic applications.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsBiomarkersHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesBiomarkersDegenerative diseaseMultipotentProgenitor cellsRegenerative medicineStem cells

Identifiers

PMID40055783
PMCPMC11889844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.