ArticleBioData mining2025
Unsupervised clustering based coronary artery segmentation.
Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- VMamba-QAG-net: a five-stage pipeline for SYNTAX score computation and decision support in interventional cardiology using X-ray angiography.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Coronary Plaque Characterization: A Multimodal Review of OCT, IVUS, and CCTA.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe acquisition of 3D geometries of coronary arteries from computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is crucial for clinicians, enabling visualization of lesions and supporting decision-making processes. Manual segmentation of coronary arteries is time-consuming and prone to errors. There is growing interest in automatic segmentation algorithms, particularly those based on neural networks, which require large datasets and significant computational resources for training. This paper proposes an automatic segmentation methodology based on clustering algorithms and a graph structure, which integrates data from both the clustering process and the original images.
resultsThe study compares two approaches: a 2.5D version using axial, sagittal, and coronal slices (3Axis), and a perpendicular version (Perp), which uses the cross-section of each vessel. The methodology was tested on two patient groups: a test set of 10 patients and an additional set of 22 patients with clinically diagnosed lesions. The 3Axis method achieved a Dice score of 0.88 in the test set and 0.83 in the lesion set, while the Perp method obtained Dice scores of 0.81 in the test set and 0.82 in the lesion set, decreasing to 0.79 and 0.80 in the lesion region, respectively. These results are competitive with current state-of-the-art methods.
conclusionsThis clustering-based segmentation approach offers a robust framework that can be easily integrated into clinical workflows, improving both accuracy and efficiency in coronary artery analysis. Additionally, the ability to visualize clusters and graphs from any cross-section enhances the method's explainability, providing clinicians with deeper insights into vascular structures. The study demonstrates the potential of clustering algorithms for improving segmentation performance in coronary artery imaging.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.