ArticleArthritis research & therapy2025
Comparative effectiveness of subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg biweekly, subcutaneous Tocilizumab 162 mg biweekly, and intravenous Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Technique Integration Identifies O-GlcNAc Transferase in Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes as a Therapeutic Target for Rheumatoid Arthritis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Effect of Interleukin-6 Inhibitors on Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain: Overview of Evidence and Mechanistic Pathways.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Review
- Article
- From immunosuppression to immune reprogramming: is triptolide a potential "immune reset" agent in autoimmune diseases?Immunologic research · 2025Review
- Fracture-Induced Immunological Cascades Trigger Rapid Systemic Bone Loss via Osteocyte-Regulated Osteoclastogenesis.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025Article
- Tocilizumab for Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile targeting the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) through the use of sarilumab (SAR) or tocilizumab (TCZ) has become a major therapeutic approach for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), direct comparisons between IL-6R inhibitors (IL-6Ris) for treating RA have not been conducted. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of subcutaneous sarilumab (SAR-SC), subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC), and intravenous TCZ (TCZ-IV) against RA in a multicenter cohort study.
methodsWithin the target trial emulation framework, an incident new-user and active-comparator cohort design was used. The source population was the entire cohort of a multicenter prospective study (the ANSWER cohort study) in Japan from 2009 to 2023. We consecutively included patients with IL-6Ri-naïve RA who initiated treatment with SAR-SC 200 mg biweekly, TCZ-SC 162 mg biweekly, or TCZ-IV 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks as the approved starting dose and dosing interval at baseline. The primary outcome of interest was the change in the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) at 24 weeks.
resultsIn total, 1001 IL-6Ri-naïve patients were included (SAR-SC 200 mg biweekly, 201 patients; TCZ-SC 162 mg biweekly, 546; TCZ-IV 8 mg/kg every 4 week, 254). The improvement in CDAI at 24 weeks (primary outcome) was statistically significantly greater in the SAR-SC group than in the TCZ-SC group (-2.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): -4.38 to -0.69, p = 0.007), but that in TCZ-IV was not significantly different from that in TCZ-SC (1.00, 95% CI: -0.68 to 2.69, p = 0.243). Similar results were noted regarding the changes in CDAI at weeks 4, 12, and 48. The retention rates at 48 weeks in SAR-SC and TCZ-IV did not significantly differ from that in TCZ-SC.
conclusionsSAR-SC 200 mg biweekly initiation was associated with a statistically significantly greater decrease in disease activity than TCZ-SC 162 mg biweekly in IL-6Ri-naïve patients with RA. In contrast, no statistically significant differences were identified between TCZ-IV 8 mg/kg every 4 week and TCZ-SC 162 mg biweekly. However, the effect size of our findings should necessitate careful consideration of the cost difference between TCZ-SC 162 mg biweekly including its biosimilars and SAR-SC 200 mg biweekly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.