Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40055699›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2025

Did a national extended access scheme translate to improvements in patient experience to GP services in England? A retrospective observational study using patient-level data from the English GP patient survey.

Liwei Mou, Yiu-Shing Lau, Patrick Burch, William Whittaker

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Yonder: Extended access, GP retention, registrar wellbeing interventions, and contacts post-paediatric admission.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liwei MouHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. liwei.mou@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.
Yiu-Shing LauHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Patrick BurchHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
William WhittakerPublic Health Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Block B Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK.

Funding

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester NIHR-INF-2072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving access to general practitioner (GP) services is seen as a way to enhance patients' experiences. England introduced the national extended access scheme to provide routine and urgent GP appointments outside core hours. However, little is known about how this initiative affects patient experience, especially in terms of efficiency and equity. This study aimed to estimate the differential effects of extended access appointments on patient-reported satisfaction, focusing on different service delivery types to assess efficiency and on patient characteristics to evaluate equity of access.

methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted using data from the English GP Patient Survey (GPPS) (2018 and 2019), linked with data on extended access from NHS records (March 2017 and March 2018). Regression models were used to examine associations between different types of extended access service delivery and patient experience measures (overall experience with GP, satisfaction with appointment time, overall satisfaction with making an appointment, and frequency of seeing or speaking to a preferred GP). Main heterogeneous analyses tested whether effects varied by patient age and employment status. Additional heterogeneous analyses assessed whether the effects differed in patient awareness of services and service providers (GP or GP group where practices collaborate).

resultsThe analyses did not identify significant linear associations between extended access services and patient experience measures. However, some evidence suggested that the frequency of seeing or speaking to a preferred GP (a measure of continuity of care) was negatively associated with extended access services, although not linearly. The effect of extended access did not differ by age, but a small positive effect was observed on satisfaction with appointment times for patients in full-time employment. The study also found that greater cooperation between GPs positively impacted patient experience but might compromise continuity of care.

conclusionsThe national extended access scheme had a positive effect on improving satisfaction with appointment times for patients in full-time work, but the effect was not seen across the whole population. The provision of extended access services by GPs at scale may provide additional capacity and choice of care for patients, but care continuity could be threatened.

Indexed as

General PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityPatient SatisfactionAdolescentAdultAgedAppointments and SchedulesEnglandFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesAccess to healthcareEnglandGeneral practiceLarge datasetPatient experienceService delivery

Identifiers

PMID40055699
PMCPMC11889905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.