Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40055672›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Nurse‒physician interprofessional collaboration in the context of expanding nursing practice in primary health care: A comparative qualitative study of Brazil and Germany.

Cassiano Mendes Franco, Daria Bula, Beatriz Rosana Gonçalves de Oliveira Toso, Ligia Giovanella, Kerstin Hämel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cassiano Mendes FrancoSergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation , R. Leopoldo Bulhões, 1480, 21041-210, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Daria BulaDepartment of Health Services Research and Nursing Science, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitaetsstrasse 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Beatriz Rosana Gonçalves de Oliveira TosoWestern Paraná State University , R. Universitária, Paraná, 2069, 85819-110, Cascavel, Brazil.
Ligia GiovanellaSergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation , R. Leopoldo Bulhões, 1480, 21041-210, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Kerstin HämelDepartment of Health Services Research and Nursing Science, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitaetsstrasse 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. kerstin.haemel@univie.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1034-2373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing complexity of patients' health needs has led to the expansion of nursing practices in primary health care (PHC) globally. The corresponding rearrangements of the care process have promoted more horizontal relationships and interprofessional collaboration between nurses and physicians. Our study analyzes the current forms and prospects of nurse‒physician collaboration in the context of expanding nursing practice in PHC in Brazil and Germany.

methodsWe hosted 9 focus groups (4 in Brazil and 5 in Germany) featuring a total of 23 stakeholders who were involved in PHC policy making and 25 practicing nurses and physicians. Brazil and Germany were subjected to comparative analysis using the thematic coding approach suggested by Flick.

resultsRegarding the current forms of nurse‒physician collaboration, focus group participants identified the opportunities and obstacles exhibited by the PHC models employed in their respective countries. In both countries, nurses' contributions to PHC were associated mainly with the task of meeting complex health needs; however, promoting nurse engagement is challenged by the predominance of physicians' power in health care policies and practices. With respect to future trends in the expansion of nursing practices in collaboration with physicians, all participants in Brazil supported a complementary approach that focused on increasing the autonomy of nurses in PHC; in Germany, mixed opinions were expressed regarding this issue, with medical stakeholders and some general practitioners (GPs) insisting on a delegation-based approach.

conclusionsOur study contributes to the literature by highlighting the opportunities and obstacles associated with interprofessional collaboration in the context of expanding nursing practice in PHC. The study highlights the willingness of both nurses and physicians to increase their level of collaboration by encouraging broader nursing practices. However, the power imbalance and hierarchical relations hinder the progress of collaboration between PHC nurses and physicians based on the logic of interprofessionality. The contrasting perspectives, which emphasize an autonomous interprofessional relationship and collaboration based on a subordinate relationship in the context of persistent medical hegemony, reflect certain contextual aspects of these health systems and conceptual approaches to care practices.

Indexed as

General practitionersInterprofessional relationsNursesNurse’s rolePatient care teamPhysician‒Nurse relationsPhysiciansPrimary health careQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID40055672
PMCPMC11887383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.