Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40055666›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2025

Exploring comorbidity networks in mild traumatic brain injury subjects through graph theory: a traumatic brain injury model systems study.

Kaustav Mehta, Shyam Kumar Sudhakar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaustav MehtaKrea University, 5655, Central Expressway, Sri City, AP, 517646, India.
Shyam Kumar SudhakarKrea University, 5655, Central Expressway, Sri City, AP, 517646, India. shyamkumar.sudhakar@krea.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are characterized by myriad comorbidities that affect the functioning of the affected individuals. The comorbidities that TBI subjects experience span a wide range, ranging from psychiatric diseases to those that affect the various systems of the body. This is compounded by the fact that the problems that TBI subjects face could span over an extended period post-primary injury. Further, no drug exists to prevent the spread of secondary injuries after a primary impact.

methodsIn this study, we employed graph theory to understand the patterns of comorbidities after mild TBIs. Disease comorbidity networks were constructed for old and young subjects with mild TBIs and a novel clustering algorithm was applied to understand the comorbidity patterns.

resultsUpon application of network analysis and the clustering algorithm, we discovered interesting associations between comorbidities in young and old subjects with the condition. Specifically, bipolar disorder was seen as related to cardiovascular comorbidities, a pattern that was observed only in the young subjects. Similar associations between obsessive-compulsive disorder and rheumatoid arthritis were observed in young subjects. Psychiatric comorbidities exhibited differential associations with non-psychiatric comorbidities depending on the age of the cohort.

conclusionThe study results could have implications for effective surveillance and the management of comorbidities post mild TBIs.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionBrain Injuries, TraumaticAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultCentralityComorbiditiesDisease comorbidity networkGraph theoryTraumatic brain injuries

Identifiers

PMID40055666
PMCPMC11887189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.