ArticleBMC cancer2025
Efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant HAIC with FOLFOX combining PD-1 inhibitors in HCC patients with microvascular invasion: a propensity score matching analysis.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Systemic Therapies (2020-2025).Liver cancer · 2026Review
- Editorial: Advances in chemotherapy-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma, volume II.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant HAIC combining lenvatinib with or without PD-1 inhibitors in solitary large HCC: A multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (PA-HAIC) plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors versus PA-HAIC alone for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI).
methodsThis retrospective study included HCC patients with MVI who were treated with either PA-HAIC or PA-HAIC plus PD-1 inhibitors between February 2021 and February 2024. The differences in baseline characteristics, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups before and after propensity score-matching (PSM). The treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared among the two groups after PSM. Cox regression analysis was utilized to determine factors affecting DFS and OS.
resultsA total of 102 patients were included in the study: 65 in the PA-HAIC group and 37 in the PA-HAIC plus PD-1 group. PSM analysis generated 32 matched pairs of patients in the two groups. The HCC patients in the PA-HAIC plus PD-1 group experienced significantly better DFS compared to those in the PA-HAIC group alone (HR: 0.412; P = 0.031). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (P = 0.124). Multivariate analysis identified the treatment option (PA-HAIC vs. PA-HAIC + PD-1) as an independent predictive factor for DFS of the patients. Furthermore, the results indicated no statistically significant difference in the incidence of TRAEs between the two groups (P < 0.05).
conclusionIn comparison with PA-HAIC alone, PA-HAIC combined with PD-1 inhibitors could improve the DFS benefits with acceptable safety profiles in HCC patients with MVI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.