ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Development and validation of computer-aided detection for colorectal neoplasms using deep learning incorporated with computed tomography colonography.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Association of FIT-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening with Earlier Disease Detection: The Romanian Experience.Cancers · 2026Article
- Attention-Enhanced ResNet-U-Net for Automated Colorectal Tumor Segmentation in CT Scans.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emerging Endorobotic and AI Technologies in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Review of Design, Validation, and Translational Pathways.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Could artificial intelligence-powered colonoscopies change the future of colorectal cancer screening?World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Advances in Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: How Precision Medicine Is Changing the Game.Cancers · 2025Review
- The potential of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening in Japan.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesComputed tomography (CT) colonography is increasingly recognized as a valuable modality for diagnosing colorectal lesions, however, the interpretation workload remains challenging for physicians. Deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been employed for imaging diagnoses. In this study, we examined the sensitivity of neoplastic lesions in CT colonography images.
methodsLesion location and size were evaluated during colonoscopy and a large-scale database including a dataset for AI learning and external validation was created. The DICOM data used as training data and internal validation data (total 453 patients) for this study were colorectal cancer screening test data from two multicenter joint trial conducted in Japan and data from two institutions. External validation data (137 patients) were from other two institutions. Lesions were categorized into ≥6 mm, 6 to 10 mm, and ≥10 mm. During this study, we adopted a neural network structure that was designed based on the faster R-CNNs to detect colorectal lesion. The sensitivity of detecting colorectal lesions was verified when one and two positions were integrated.
resultsInternal validation yielded sensitivity of 0.815, 0.738, and 0.883 for lesions ≥6 mm, 6 to 10 mm, and ≥10 mm, respectively, with a false lesion limit of three. Two external validation produced rates of 0.705 and 0.707, 0.575 and 0.573, and 0.760 and 0.779 for each lesion category. Combining two positions for each patient in calculating the sensitivity resulted in significantly improved rates for each lesion category.
conclusionsThe sensitivity of CT colonography images using the AI algorithm was improved by integrating evaluations in two positions. Validation experiments involving radiologists who can interpret images as well as AI to determine the auxiliary diagnosis can reduce the workload of physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.