Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40055612›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025

Development and validation of computer-aided detection for colorectal neoplasms using deep learning incorporated with computed tomography colonography.

Shungo Endo, Koichi Nagata, Kenichi Utano, Satoshi Nozu, Takaaki Yasuda, Ken Takabayashi, Michiaki Hirayama, Kazutomo Togashi, Hiromasa Ohira

Abstract readValidation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shungo EndoDepartment of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizuwakamatsu City, Japan. endoswing@gmail.com.
Koichi NagataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima City, Japan.
Kenichi UtanoDepartment of Radiology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizuwakamatsu City, Japan.
Satoshi NozuDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Saitama Prefectual Cancer Center, Ina-machi, Japan.
Takaaki YasudaDepartment of Radiology, Nagasaki Kamigoto Hospital, Shin Kamigoto-cho, Nagasaki, Japan.
Ken TakabayashiDepartment of Radiology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo City, Japan.
Michiaki HirayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo City, Japan.
Kazutomo TogashiDepartment of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizuwakamatsu City, Japan.
Hiromasa OhiraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima City, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesComputed tomography (CT) colonography is increasingly recognized as a valuable modality for diagnosing colorectal lesions, however, the interpretation workload remains challenging for physicians. Deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been employed for imaging diagnoses. In this study, we examined the sensitivity of neoplastic lesions in CT colonography images.

methodsLesion location and size were evaluated during colonoscopy and a large-scale database including a dataset for AI learning and external validation was created. The DICOM data used as training data and internal validation data (total 453 patients) for this study were colorectal cancer screening test data from two multicenter joint trial conducted in Japan and data from two institutions. External validation data (137 patients) were from other two institutions. Lesions were categorized into ≥6 mm, 6 to 10 mm, and ≥10 mm. During this study, we adopted a neural network structure that was designed based on the faster R-CNNs to detect colorectal lesion. The sensitivity of detecting colorectal lesions was verified when one and two positions were integrated.

resultsInternal validation yielded sensitivity of 0.815, 0.738, and 0.883 for lesions ≥6 mm, 6 to 10 mm, and ≥10 mm, respectively, with a false lesion limit of three. Two external validation produced rates of 0.705 and 0.707, 0.575 and 0.573, and 0.760 and 0.779 for each lesion category. Combining two positions for each patient in calculating the sensitivity resulted in significantly improved rates for each lesion category.

conclusionsThe sensitivity of CT colonography images using the AI algorithm was improved by integrating evaluations in two positions. Validation experiments involving radiologists who can interpret images as well as AI to determine the auxiliary diagnosis can reduce the workload of physicians.

Indexed as

Colonography, Computed TomographicColorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceColorectal lesionComputed tomography colonographyDeep learning

Identifiers

PMID40055612
PMCPMC11889859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.