ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
GoldPolish-target: targeted long-read genome assembly polishing.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finishing a complete giraffe genome from telomere to telomere with Verkko-Fillet.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Interpreting antimicrobial resistance from bacterial whole-genome sequencing: prediction tools, database fragmentation, analytical trade-offs, and harmonized reporting.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Finishing a complete giraffe genome from telomere to telomere with Verkko-Fillet.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Misdetection of frameshifts in SARS-CoV-2 genomes: need for additional harmonisation and efficient monitoring of data workflows.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvanced long-read sequencing technologies, such as those from Oxford Nanopore Technologies and Pacific Biosciences, are finding a wide use in de novo genome sequencing projects. However, long reads typically have higher error rates relative to short reads. If left unaddressed, subsequent genome assemblies may exhibit high base error rates that compromise the reliability of downstream analysis. Several specialized error correction tools for genome assemblies have since emerged, employing a range of algorithms and strategies to improve base quality. However, despite these efforts, many genome assembly workflows still produce regions with elevated error rates, such as gaps filled with unpolished or ambiguous bases. To address this, we introduce GoldPolish-Target, a modular targeted sequence polishing pipeline. Coupled with GoldPolish, a linear-time genome assembly algorithm, GoldPolish-Target isolates and polishes user-specified assembly loci, offering a resource-efficient means for polishing targeted regions of draft genomes.
resultsExperiments using Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens datasets demonstrate that GoldPolish-Target can reduce insertion/deletion (indel) and mismatch errors by up to 49.2% and 55.4% respectively, achieving base accuracy values upwards of 99.9% (Phred score Q > 30). This polishing accuracy is comparable to the current state-of-the-art, Medaka, while exhibiting up to 27-fold shorter run times and consuming 95% less memory, on average.
conclusionGoldPolish-Target, in contrast to most other polishing tools, offers the ability to target specific regions of a genome assembly for polishing, providing a computationally light-weight and highly scalable solution for base error correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.