ArticleScientific reports2025
Physics-informed machine learning for automatic model reduction in chemical reaction networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein force spectroscopy using magnetic tweezers: Slow and steady wins the race?Biophysical journal · 2026Review
- Emerging Technologies and Integrated Interdisciplinary Strategies for Mitigating Protein Aggregation in Therapeutic Formulations.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Review
- Emerging nanocarrier systems for the enhanced delivery of active pharmaceutical ingredients to the intestine.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Advancing atomic electron tomography with neural networks.Applied microscopy · 2025Review
- Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Polymers: A Review.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physics-informed machine learning bridges the gap between the high fidelity of mechanistic models and the adaptive insights of artificial intelligence. In chemical reaction network modeling, this synergy proves valuable, addressing the high computational costs of detailed mechanistic models while leveraging the predictive power of machine learning. This study applies this fusion to the biomedical challenge of Aβ fibril aggregation, a key factor in Alzheimer's disease. Central to the research is the introduction of an automatic reaction order model reduction framework, designed to optimize reduced-order kinetic models. This framework represents a shift in model construction, automatically determining the appropriate level of detail for reaction network modeling. The proposed approach significantly improves simulation efficiency and accuracy, particularly in systems like Aβ aggregation, where precise modeling of nucleation and growth kinetics can reveal potential therapeutic targets. Additionally, the automatic model reduction technique has the potential to generalize to other network models. The methodology offers a scalable and adaptable tool for applications beyond biomedical research. Its ability to dynamically adjust model complexity based on system-specific needs ensures that models remain both computationally feasible and scientifically relevant, accommodating new data and evolving understandings of complex phenomena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.