ArticleCommunications biology2025
Configural processing as an optimized strategy for robust object recognition in neural networks.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural representation of object category and viewpoint in the entopallium of pigeons.Zoological research · 2026Article
- From global to local: ERP repetition effects reveal a configural-to-featural pattern in face processing.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Adaptive rightward gaze shifts support configural object recognition during perceptual challenge.iScience · 2026Article
- Configural processing as an optimized strategy for robust object recognition in neural networks.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Configural processing, the perception of spatial relationships among an object's components, is crucial for object recognition, yet its teleology and underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesize that configural processing drives robust recognition under varying conditions. Using identification tasks with composite letter stimuli, we compare neural network models trained with either configural or local cues. We find that configural cues support robust generalization across geometric transformations (e.g., rotation, scaling) and novel feature sets. When both cues are available, configural cues dominate local features. Layerwise analysis reveals that sensitivity to configural cues emerges later in processing, likely enhancing robustness to pixel-level transformations. Notably, this occurs in a purely feedforward manner without recurrent computations. These findings with letter stimuli successfully extend to naturalistic face images. Our results demonstrate that configural processing emerges in a naíve network based on task contingencies, and is beneficial for robust object processing under varying viewing conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.