ArticleScientific reports2025
Validation of the Chinese version of the self-injurious thoughts and behaviors interview for adolescent outpatients in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behavior Interview (SITBI) has been widely used in Western countries, but its use in Chinese culture is limited. Based on the scarcity of standardized Chinese interviews to assess self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, this study aimed to validate the SITBI Chinese version (SITBI-C). The psychometric properties of the SITBI-C were tested in 195 outpatient adolescents with various levels of suicidality. The test-retest, interrater and concurrent validity were investigated in this study. The analysis of the SITBI-C showed perfect test-retest reliability within one week. The interrater agreement was also excellent, ranging across SITB-C items. The validity indices were good when comparing the responses to the SITBI-C and other interview-based and self-reported measures, suggesting strong convergent validity. Overall, the results of this research suggested that the SITBI-C demonstrated good psychometric properties. The SITBI-C is appropriate for assessing suicidality in the Chinese adolescent population and can be used to assess adolescent suicidal ideation to determine the risk for suicidal behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.