ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable AI analysis for smog rating prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smog poses a direct threat to human health and the environment. Addressing this issue requires understanding how smog is formed. While major contributors include industries, fossil fuels, crop burning, and ammonia from fertilizers, vehicles play a significant role. Individually, a vehicle's contribution to smog may be small, but collectively, the vast number of vehicles has a substantial impact. Manually assessing the contribution of each vehicle to smog is impractical. However, advancements in machine learning make it possible to quantify this contribution. By creating a dataset with features such as vehicle model, year, fuel consumption (city), and fuel type, a predictive model can classify vehicles based on their smog impact, rating them on a scale from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent). This study proposes a novel approach using Random Forest and Explainable Boosting Classifier models, along with SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique), to predict the smog contribution of individual vehicles. The results outperform previous studies, with the proposed model achieving an accuracy of 86%. Key performance metrics include a Mean Squared Error of 0.2269, R-Squared (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.