ArticleScientific reports2025
Probabilistic and deep learning approaches for conductivity-driven nanocomposite classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To foster greater trust and adoption of machine learning models, particularly neural networks, it is essential to develop approaches that quantify and report epistemic uncertainties alongside random uncertainties, which often affect the accuracy of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). Addressing these challenges, this study proposes a hybrid approach integrating Bayesian techniques and deep learning to improve the classification of nanocomposites with a focus on evaluating their conductivity properties. The proposed framework begins with a Bayesian Network (BN) model, which provides probabilistic insights into the conductive behavior of nanocomposites by analyzing the distribution and interaction of their constituent nanoparticles. This probabilistic foundation is complemented by a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) based on the Transformer architecture, which enhances classification accuracy by capturing sequential dependencies and complex data patterns. The hybrid model combines the probabilistic reasoning capabilities of BNs with the deep learning strengths of RNNs, yielding a more robust and adaptable classification methodology. While this study primarily focuses on methodological advancements, experimental results demonstrate that the hybrid model significantly outperforms individual approaches in terms of key evaluation metrics. This integrated framework thus represents a promising step toward improving the predictive classification of nanocomposite conductivity, offering a balance between probabilistic interpretability and data-driven accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.