ArticleScientific reports2025
Hyperspectral estimation of chlorophyll content in grapevine based on feature selection and GA-BP.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- VIS-NIR-SWIR Hyperspectral Imaging and Advanced Machine and Deep Learning Algorithms for a Controlled Benchmark of Bean Seed Identification and Classification.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction of growth parameters in the medicinal plantFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Variation in Assessment of Leaf Pigment Content from Vegetation Indices Caused by Positions and Widths of Spectral Channels.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is a key indicator for assessing the growth of grapes. Hyperspectral techniques have been applied to LCC research. However, quantitative prediction of grape LCC using this technique remains challenging due to baseline drift, spectral peak overlap, and ambiguity in the sensitive spectral range. To address these issues, two typical crop leaf hyperspectral data were collected to reveal the spectral response characteristics of grape LCC using standardization by variables (SNV) and multiple far scattering correction (MSC) preprocessing variations. The sensitive spectral range is determined by Pearson's algorithm, and sensitive features are further extracted within that range using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and Principal components analysis (PCA). Comparison of the prediction ability of Random Forest Regression (RFR) algorithm, Support Vector Machine Regression (SVR) model, and Genetic Algorithm-Based Neural Network (GA-BP) on grape LCC based on sensitive features. A SNV-RFE-GA-BP framework for predicting hyperspectral LCC in grapes is proposed, where [Formula: see text]=0.835 and NRMSE = 0.091. The analysis results show that SNV and MSC treatments improve the correlation between spectral reflectance and LCC, and different feature screening methods have a greater impact on the model prediction accuracy. It was shown that SNV-based processed hyperspectral data combined with GA-BP has great potential for efficient chlorophyll monitoring in grapevine. This method provides a new framework theory for constructing a hyperspectral analytical model of grapevine key growth indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.