Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40055354›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hyperspectral estimation of chlorophyll content in grapevine based on feature selection and GA-BP.

YaFeng Li, XinGang Xu, WenBiao Wu, Yaohui Zhu, LuTao Gao, XiangTai Jiang, Yang Meng, GuiJun Yang, HanYu Xue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

YaFeng LiKey Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, 100097, China.
XinGang XuKey Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, 100097, China.
WenBiao WuKey Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, 100097, China. wuwb@nercita.org.cn.
Yaohui ZhuSchool of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.
LuTao GaoCollege of Big Data, Yunnan Agricultural University, Yunnan, 650500, China.
XiangTai JiangKey Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, 100097, China.
Yang MengKey Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, 100097, China.
GuiJun YangKey Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, 100097, China.
HanYu XueKey Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, 100097, China.

Funding

National Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System Grant CARS-03Yunnan Province Major Science and Technology Special Project 202202AE090013-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is a key indicator for assessing the growth of grapes. Hyperspectral techniques have been applied to LCC research. However, quantitative prediction of grape LCC using this technique remains challenging due to baseline drift, spectral peak overlap, and ambiguity in the sensitive spectral range. To address these issues, two typical crop leaf hyperspectral data were collected to reveal the spectral response characteristics of grape LCC using standardization by variables (SNV) and multiple far scattering correction (MSC) preprocessing variations. The sensitive spectral range is determined by Pearson's algorithm, and sensitive features are further extracted within that range using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and Principal components analysis (PCA). Comparison of the prediction ability of Random Forest Regression (RFR) algorithm, Support Vector Machine Regression (SVR) model, and Genetic Algorithm-Based Neural Network (GA-BP) on grape LCC based on sensitive features. A SNV-RFE-GA-BP framework for predicting hyperspectral LCC in grapes is proposed, where [Formula: see text]=0.835 and NRMSE = 0.091. The analysis results show that SNV and MSC treatments improve the correlation between spectral reflectance and LCC, and different feature screening methods have a greater impact on the model prediction accuracy. It was shown that SNV-based processed hyperspectral data combined with GA-BP has great potential for efficient chlorophyll monitoring in grapevine. This method provides a new framework theory for constructing a hyperspectral analytical model of grapevine key growth indicators.

Indexed as

ChlorophyllHyperspectral ImagingVitisAlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerPlant LeavesPrincipal Component AnalysisSupport Vector MachineChlorophyllData preprocessingFeature selectionHyperspectral monitoring.Machine learning

Identifiers

PMID40055354
PMCPMC11889130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.