ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2025
Age-related differences across the adult lifespan: a comparison of six field assessments of physical function.
Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cross-sectional and prospective associations between jump performance and functional outcomes in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Intrinsic capacity and mortality in community-dwelling octogenarians: a network analysis from the ilSIRENTE study.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Effect of Age and Sex on Lower Extremity Power Production Capacity Throughout the Lifespan Based on 30 217 Finnish Participant Data.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Article
- Age-Related Structural-Functional Discrepancy in Muscle Indicators Among Rural Korean Older Women.Journal of aging research · 2026Article
- Associations Between Makeup Use and Physical, Cognitive, and Psychological Functions in Community-Dwelling Older Women.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAge-related declines in physical capabilities often result from decreased lower-limb muscle strength and power, which are measurable through field tests. Various tests can detect functional declines in older adults, but their responsiveness to age-related differences is less understood in those without substantial impairments. Therefore, this study evaluated and compared the ability of field tests to detect age-related changes in physical and muscle function across adulthood.
methods304 participants (52% female; 19-85 years) completed six field tests: handgrip strength (HGS), maximal gait speed (MGS) over a 10-m course, 5-repetition sit-to-stand power (STSP), timed up and go (TUG), countermovement jump (CMJ), and stair climbing power (SCP). Segmented regression analysis determined the relationship between age and field test performance, and identified the age at which the rate of decline increased. A multilevel linear mixed model compared decline rates between tests.
resultsBefore 60 years, SCP and CMJ were responsive to age-related differences (-0.70 to -0.81%/year, p < 0.05), whereas TUG and STSP (lower age-related decline, -0.18% to -0.52%/year, p < 0.05) and HGS and MGS (no significant age-related decline) exhibited lower responsiveness. After 60, most tests (except the STSP) demonstrated increased responsiveness to age-related differences, although these differences remain most pronounced in SCP and CMJ (-1.61 to -1.75%/year, p < 0.05).
conclusionsThese findings imply that most field tests are responsive to age-related declines in physical and/or muscle function after 60. In younger age groups, field tests that evaluate lower-limb power and have minimal ceiling effects, such as SCP and CMJ, should be prioritized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.