Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40055287›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2025

Age-related differences across the adult lifespan: a comparison of six field assessments of physical function.

Lien Meulemans, Jolien Deboutte, Jan Seghers, Christophe Delecluse, Evelien Van Roie

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lien MeulemansDepartment of Movement Sciences, Physical Activity, Sports & Health Research Group, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101 - bus 1501, Leuven, 3001, Belgium.
Jolien DeboutteDepartment of Movement Sciences, Physical Activity, Sports & Health Research Group, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101 - bus 1501, Leuven, 3001, Belgium.
Jan SeghersDepartment of Movement Sciences, Physical Activity, Sports & Health Research Group, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101 - bus 1501, Leuven, 3001, Belgium.
Christophe Delecluse *Department of Movement Sciences, Physical Activity, Sports & Health Research Group, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101 - bus 1501, Leuven, 3001, Belgium.
Evelien Van Roie *Department of Movement Sciences, Physical Activity, Sports & Health Research Group, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101 - bus 1501, Leuven, 3001, Belgium. evelien.vanroie@kuleuven.be.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 12Z5720N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAge-related declines in physical capabilities often result from decreased lower-limb muscle strength and power, which are measurable through field tests. Various tests can detect functional declines in older adults, but their responsiveness to age-related differences is less understood in those without substantial impairments. Therefore, this study evaluated and compared the ability of field tests to detect age-related changes in physical and muscle function across adulthood.

methods304 participants (52% female; 19-85 years) completed six field tests: handgrip strength (HGS), maximal gait speed (MGS) over a 10-m course, 5-repetition sit-to-stand power (STSP), timed up and go (TUG), countermovement jump (CMJ), and stair climbing power (SCP). Segmented regression analysis determined the relationship between age and field test performance, and identified the age at which the rate of decline increased. A multilevel linear mixed model compared decline rates between tests.

resultsBefore 60 years, SCP and CMJ were responsive to age-related differences (-0.70 to -0.81%/year, p < 0.05), whereas TUG and STSP (lower age-related decline, -0.18% to -0.52%/year, p < 0.05) and HGS and MGS (no significant age-related decline) exhibited lower responsiveness. After 60, most tests (except the STSP) demonstrated increased responsiveness to age-related differences, although these differences remain most pronounced in SCP and CMJ (-1.61 to -1.75%/year, p < 0.05).

conclusionsThese findings imply that most field tests are responsive to age-related declines in physical and/or muscle function after 60. In younger age groups, field tests that evaluate lower-limb power and have minimal ceiling effects, such as SCP and CMJ, should be prioritized.

Indexed as

AgingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsExercise TestFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthWalking SpeedYoung AdultAgeingFunctional performanceInertial measurement unitMuscle powerPhysical capacityStair climbing

Identifiers

PMID40055287
PMCPMC11889021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.