ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025
Exploring 2SLGBTQIA+ Couples' Experiences of Third-Party Reproduction.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to explore the experiences of two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex, asexual, or otherwise gender or sexually diverse (2SLGBTQIA+) couples pursuing third-party reproduction (TPR). A sample of 31 2SLGBTQIA+ couples (n = 62) from the USA and Canada attempting to conceive via third-party reproduction were recruited online, underwent a semi-structured interview about their experiences, and completed an online survey assessing fertility quality of life, anxious and depressive symptoms, and institutional betrayal in healthcare. Descriptive statistics were used to assess mean levels of quality of life, mental health symptoms, and institutional betrayal. Rates of clinically significant reductions in quality of life and mental health were assessed. Thematic analysis was applied to the interview transcripts. Data were collected between November 2021 and July 2022. Thematic analysis identified numerous challenges in pursuing TPR, many of which were specifically tied to participants' membership in the 2SLGBTQIA+ community. Two overarching themes were identified: "system-level issues," such as a lack of information pertaining to their unique situation, and "provider-level issues," such as the holding of heteronormative assumptions by providers. Quantitative findings revealed that a large proportion of the sample, 34%, scored in the clinical range on anxiety and depression questionnaires. The intended gestating partners reported poorer quality of life relative to their non-gestating partners. 2SLGBTQIA+ couples attempting to conceive via third-party reproduction experience psychological distress and reduced quality of life and face inequities and challenges at the system and provider level. These findings lead to concrete recommendations for clinicians providing fertility services to cultivate competence and improve care standards for this population according to their ethical responsibility and highlight the need for policy change and the development of targeted supports. Key recommendations include 2SLGBTQIA+-specific training for staff, using inclusive language, visuals, and documentation processes, refraining from hetero- and cisnormative assumptions, developing anti-discrimination policy and a process to assess and respond to clients' mental health needs, and identifying and sharing information and supports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40055262What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.