Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40055247›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Dissociating premotor and motor components of response times: Evidence of independent decisional effects during motor-response execution.

Saman Kamari Songhorabadi, Simone Sulpizio, Michele Scaltritti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saman Kamari SonghorabadiDipartimento Di Psicologia e Scienze Cognitive, Università Degli Studi Di Trento, Corso Bettini 31, 38068, Rovereto, TN, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7950-5105
Simone SulpizioDipartimento Di Psicologia, Università Degli Studi Di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4051-9494
Michele ScaltrittiDipartimento Di Psicologia e Scienze Cognitive, Università Degli Studi Di Trento, Corso Bettini 31, 38068, Rovereto, TN, Italy. michele.scaltritti@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3328-1748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional measures of response times (RTs) capture the summed duration of multiple latent and overt processes, including motor-response execution. The present research assessed the functional independence of the decisional components unfolding before vs after the onset of the muscular activation in the context of a lexical decision task requiring manual button-press responses. Specifically, the lexicality effect (slower latencies for nonwords compared to words) was separately tracked across premotor and motor components of RTs under different regimes of decision bias. Whereas at the premotor level the lexicality effect was modulated by the proportion of word vs nonword trials in the block, with a reversal of the lexicality phenomenon when nonwords occurred in 75% of the trials, motor times (i.e., a chronometric measure of response duration) consistently displayed longer durations for nonword responses, irrespective of bias manipulation. The results point to a partial functional independence between the decisional components involved at the premotor vs motor level, suggesting that the onset of motor behavior may represent the onset of specific decisional processes, rather than the termination or the continuation of computations unfolding in the premotor interval.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultMental chronometry; response time; decision making; motor-response execution

Identifiers

PMID40055247
PMCPMC12325556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.