ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2025
Associations of social isolation with memory and cognitive function in middle-aged and older Chinese adults.
Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- From verbal fluency to naturalistic speech: a scoping review of language correlates of loneliness and social isolation in older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Social alienation and cognitive function among older adults: the mediating roles of ruminative thinking and self-neglect.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough social isolation has been identified as a risk factor for cognitive impairment, its potential impact relative to other documented risk factors has not been comprehensively quantified, leading to its underestimation in public health strategies. We aimed to address this gap by quantifying the contribution of social isolation to cognitive decline in the context of other risk factors.
methodsSocial isolation was evaluated using a modified Social Network Index (SNI) and cognitive function through the Delayed Word Recall Test (DWRT) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Linear and logistic regression models were employed to analyze the associations between social isolation and cognitive outcomes, adjusting for demographic and health-related factors. Additionally, the XGBoost algorithm with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to quantify the relative importance of predictors.
resultsA total of 25,981 participants were recruited from 2003 to 2008. The mean age was 62.0 years, with 28.4% being men. Higher social isolation was significantly associated with lower DWRT (β=-0.15; 95% CI: -0.21 to -0.09) and MMSE scores (β=-0.34; 95% CI: -0.48 to -0.19), and higher odds of memory impairment (OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.40) and poor cognitive function (OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.99). XGBoost analysis ranked social isolation as the fifth most important predictor for MMSE scores (SHAP value = 0.175) and the eighth for memory impairment (SHAP value = 0.0133). Subgroup analyses indicated stronger associations among older adults, and individuals with lower education or manual occupation.
conclusionOur findings showed that social isolation is an important risk factor for cognitive outcomes. This underscores the urgent need for targeted public health interventions addressing social isolation, alongside other key risk factors, to preserve cognitive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.