Trial reportEuropean radiology2025
Human-AI collaboration in large language model-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis: a usability study.
Trial report in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human-AI collaboration in large language model-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis: a usability study.European radiology · 2025Trial
- Agreement of Multimodal Large Language Models and Novice Readers With Expert-Based Radiographic Scoring of Presumptive Septic Carpal Arthritis in Calves.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026Article
- Evaluating Large Reasoning Models Versus Human Multidisciplinary Teams in Lung Cancer Decision-Making: Real-World Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Human-AI Interaction in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Independent and collaborative performance of large language models and healthcare professionals in diagnosis and triage.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Human-large language model collaboration in clinical medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- From Agents to Governance: Essential AI Skills for Clinicians in the Large Language Model Era.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Comparative assessment of DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-4 for structured ultrasound reporting of adnexal masses.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Exposing the fragility of LLM reasoning through bias-inducing prompts: evidence from BiasMedQA.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Agentic AI and Large Language Models in Radiology: Opportunities and Hallucination Challenges.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Large language models in clinical psychiatry: Applications and optimization strategies.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Review
- Boosting LLM-assisted diagnosis: 10-minute LLM tutorial elevates radiology residents' performance in brain MRI interpretation.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Clinical insights: A comprehensive review of language models in medicine.PLOS digital health · 2025Review
- Enhancing Radiologist Productivity with Artificial Intelligence in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Benchmarking the diagnostic performance of open source LLMs in 1933 Eurorad case reports.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Unveiling GPT-4V's hidden challenges behind high accuracy on USMLE questions: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
- Wisdom of the silicon crowd: LLM ensemble prediction capabilities rival human crowd accuracy.Science advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study investigated the impact of human-large language model (LLM) collaboration on the accuracy and efficiency of brain MRI differential diagnosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, forty brain MRI cases with a challenging but definitive diagnosis were randomized into two groups of twenty cases each. Six radiology residents with an average experience of 6.3 months in reading brain MRI exams evaluated one set of cases supported by conventional internet search (Conventional) and the other set utilizing an LLM-based search engine and hybrid chatbot. A cross-over design ensured that each case was examined with both workflows in equal frequency. For each case, readers were instructed to determine the three most likely differential diagnoses. LLM responses were analyzed by a panel of radiologists. Benefits and challenges in human-LLM interaction were derived from observations and participant feedback.
resultsLLM-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis yielded superior accuracy (70/114; 61.4% (LLM-assisted) vs 53/114; 46.5% (conventional) correct diagnoses, p = 0.033, chi-square test). No difference in interpretation time or level of confidence was observed. An analysis of LLM responses revealed that correct LLM suggestions translated into correct reader responses in 82.1% of cases (60/73). Inaccurate case descriptions by readers (9.2% of cases), LLM hallucinations (11.5% of cases), and insufficient contextualization of LLM responses were identified as challenges related to human-LLM interaction.
conclusionHuman-LLM collaboration has the potential to improve brain MRI differential diagnosis. Yet, several challenges must be addressed to ensure effective adoption and user acceptance. KEY POINTS: Question While large language models (LLM) have the potential to support radiological differential diagnosis, the role of human-LLM collaboration in this context remains underexplored. Findings LLM-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis yielded superior accuracy over conventional internet search. Inaccurate case descriptions, LLM hallucinations, and insufficient contextualization were identified as potential challenges. Clinical relevance Our results highlight the potential of an LLM-assisted workflow to increase diagnostic accuracy but underline the necessity to study collaborative efforts between humans and LLMs over LLMs in isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.