ReviewEuropean radiology2025
AI and human interactions in prostate cancer diagnosis using MRI.
Review in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and future directions of AI in prostate cancer detection on MRI: a special report from the ESUR prostate MRI working group authors.European radiology · 2026Article
- The AI Act and the MDR post-market requirements for semiautonomous AI SaMD: a radiology case study in prostate cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Human-AI interaction and collaboration in radiology: from conceptual frameworks to responsible implementation.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in prostate MRI: Comparative diagnostic performance in a high-prevalence cohort.Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of natural-language-driven statistical workflows compared with conventional software for diagnostic metrics in prostate cancer research.Investigative and clinical urology · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Prostate MR Imaging: Technical Foundations, Clinical Applications, and Workflow Implications.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance of bpMRI versus mpMRI and AI-assisted bpMRI in prostate cancer detection: a multi-reader study.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- The evolving PI-RADS paradigm.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Review
- Deep learning's false positive burden may threaten the MRI harm reduction mandate in screening.European radiology · 2026Article
- Concurrent AI-human interaction in prostate cancer MRI interpretation: More hype than help?European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Current Applications and Future Directions of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Modern integrative prostate cancer diagnostics.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
- AI in radiology and interventions: a structured narrative review of workflow automation, accuracy, and efficiency gains of today and what's coming.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Prostate Cancer Pathway: Screening, Imaging, Pathology, and Biomarkers.Cureus · 2025Review
- Personalised prostate MRI: tailoring contrast medium use in an era of increasing demand.European radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This special report explores the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into prostate MRI workflows to address limitations associated with single-reader interpretations, such as inter-reader variability and diagnostic errors. We review various AI-integrated workflow strategies, from AI-assisted decision support to fully autonomous analysis, examining their benefits and challenges. AI can act as a second reader, enhancing detection sensitivity and reducing false negatives or pre-screen cases for efficient triage, thereby optimising radiologist workload. Key advantages include the potential for improved lesion detection, streamlined workflows, and reduced reporting times. However, challenges such as automation bias and the potential for inaccurate AI outputs require careful consideration and mitigation strategies. The suitability of different AI workflows is dependent on the clinical context and desired performance, with high sensitivity and negative predictive value crucial for rule-out scenarios and high specificity and positive predictive value essential for rule-in scenarios. Increased AI autonomy mandates a higher performance benchmark. The need for rigorous prospective validation studies assessing AI safety and effectiveness in real-world clinical settings is emphasised. Furthermore, the complex dynamics of human-AI interaction, encompassing positive and negative consequences, warrant further investigation. Ultimately, the strategic implementation of collaborative AI-radiologist workflows has the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency and reduce missed cancers, leading to more timely and appropriate patient care. KEY POINTS: Question Single-reader prostate MRI interpretations have reader variability and missed cancer limitations. This report explores how prospective AI integration can improve diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency. Findings From decision support to autonomous analyses, AI workflows can improve cancer detection and streamline workflows. Mitigating errors requires tailored performance and high accuracy for greater autonomy. Clinical relevance Calibrated AI-radiologist collaborations can enhance prostate cancer diagnosis by improving accuracy and efficiency while reducing unnecessary biopsies and missed cancers. Prospective research evaluating the safety and efficacy of AI deployment is needed for responsible and beneficial AI adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40055229What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.