Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40055220›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Evaluating the prognostic role of computed tomography Hounsfield units in anticipating spinal outcomes post-instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chinedu Egu, Elie Najjar, Spyridon Komaitis, Edidiong Essiet, Samuel Akintunde, Vusumuzi Sibanda, Khalid Salem, Opinder Sahota, Nasir Quraishi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The HBA-3 score: a simple bedside tool to predict cage subsidence after TLIF.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Local fragility index and Radiomics-lite modeling of CT-Derived Hounsfield units for osteoporosis risk assessment in spine surgery patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Simplified sagittal slice HU measurement as a practical alternative to conventional axial HU in opportunistic osteoporosis screening.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chinedu EguThe Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS), Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. Chinedu.brian.egu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0996-1847
Elie NajjarThe Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS), Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Spyridon KomaitisThe Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS), Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Edidiong EssietThe Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS), Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Samuel AkintundeThe Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS), Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Vusumuzi SibandaThe Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS), Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Khalid SalemThe Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS), Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Opinder SahotaThe Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS), Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Nasir QuraishiThe Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS), Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe use of Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements derived from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans has emerged as a promising surrogate for assessing bone mineral density (BMD). This systematic review aims to elucidate the role of HU in predicting spinal outcomes in patients undergoing spinal instrumentation.

methodsA comprehensive systematic review of the English-language literature was performed across multiple databases, focusing specifically on adult patients who underwent spinal instrumentation. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, studies published between 2017 and 2024 that investigated the correlation between HU measurements and spinal outcomes were included. Data extraction and subsequent meta-analysis were conducted utilizing a random effects model. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and statistical analyses were executed with R software.

resultsA total of thirty-five retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a cohort of 3,927 patients. The reported rates of complications included cage subsidence at 35.5%, pedicle screw loosening at 27.9%, proximal junctional failure at 28.6%, and pseudoarthrosis at 66.7%. Notably, lower HU values were significantly associated with an increased incidence of complications across all studies. The delineated HU cutoff thresholds for predicting specific complications were as follows: 198 HU for lumbar interbody fusion cage subsidence; 116 HU and 126 HU for pedicle screw loosening in lumbar and thoracic spine fusions, respectively; 151 HU for proximal junctional failure in thoracolumbar spinal fusion; and 240-260 HU for pseudoarthrosis following anterior odontoid screw fixation. HU measurements were typically calculated as the mean HU of the vertebrae in the operational segments: cervical (C2-C7), thoracic (T1-T12), lumbar (L1-L4), or sacral (S1).

conclusionThis meta-analysis substantiates a significant correlation between reduced HU values and spinal complications following instrumentation. Specifically, thresholds of below 130 HU for thoracic and lumbar pedicle screw loosening, below 200 HU for lumbar cage subsidence, approximately 150 HU for proximal junctional failure in the thoracolumbar region, and below 260 HU for pseudoarthrosis subsequent to anterior odontoid screw fixation were identified. The mean vertebral HU of the surgical segments serves as a reliable metric for this assessment.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsSpinal FusionSpineTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone DensityHumansPedicle ScrewsPrognosisComputed tomographyFusionHounsfield unitOsteopeniaOsteoporosisPreoperative evaluationSpinal surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.