ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Reflective analysis on the current
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alpha and Beta Emitters in Translational Nuclear Medicine: Clinical Advances, Challenges, and Future Direction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cervical lymph node response to 131I therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer using radiomics and clinical features.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Systematic adolescent-centered supportive care program is associated with improved psychological status, treatment adherence, and social adaptation in adolescents with thyroid cancer undergoing radioiodine-131 therapy: a retrospective before-after cohort study with historical controls.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- The Impact of Radioiodine (131I) Therapy of Thyroid Disease on Salivary Glands Function and Inflammation: A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRadioiodine (
methodsTotally 599 intermediate- and high-risk DTC patients from three centers were enrolled. The post-operative disease status, instant purpose verification and 12-month response to RAT were assessed using thyroglobulin levels, imagings and post-therapy whole-body scan (Rx-WBS) during follow-ups.
resultsTotally 49.75% patients were assessed as post-operative disease status excellent response (ER)/indeterminate response (IDR), 37.56% patients were biochemical incomplete response (BIR) and 12.69% were structural incomplete response (SIR). Through instant purpose verification, 49.92%, 36.73%, and 13.36% patients were targeted at remnant thyroid, biochemical and structural/functional disease, respectively. 59.39%, 13.48%, 16.55%, and 10.58% patients were ER, IDR, BIR and SIR at 12-month final response, respectively. 95.64% patients with post-operative ER/IDR remained 12-month ER/IDR. 45.78% post-operative BIR converted to ER/IDR. Intermediaterisk, T1/T2 staging, non-thyroid capsule invasion, non-multifocal lesion, times of surgery, no abnormal finding on Rx-WBS were predictors for post-operative BIR transferred to 12-month ER/IDR (all P < 0.05).
conclusionIntermediate-risk patients with post-operative ER or IDR might be spared from aggressive RAT, and patients with post-operative BIR could be potential candidates for RAT at higher administered activities (>3.7 GBq, median 5.55 GBq, IQR 4.625 GBq-5.55 GBq), especially in those with less aggressive clinicopathological features who may even obtain ER/IDR at 12-month response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40055209What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.