Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40054965›Full record

ArticleJournal of nutrition education and behavior2025

A Meta-Ethnography to Determine Critical Constructs of Nutrition Security.

Caitlyn B Faul, Stephanie Jilcott Pitts, Eric E Calloway, Hilary K Seligman, Heidi Reis, Cheryl Webb Cherry, Irene E Hatsu, Oyinlola Toyin Babatunde, Alexandra L MacMillan Uribe, Jared T McGuirt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Caitlyn B FaulDepartment of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
Stephanie Jilcott PittsDepartment of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC. Electronic address: jilcotts@ecu.edu.
Eric E CallowayCenter for Nutrition and Health Impact, Omaha, NE.
Hilary K SeligmanSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Heidi ReisBrody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
Cheryl Webb CherryDepartment of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
Irene E HatsuDepartment of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Oyinlola Toyin BabatundeDepartment of Nutrition Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
Alexandra L MacMillan UribeInstitute for Advancing Health through Agriculture, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX.
Jared T McGuirtDepartment of Nutrition, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC.
Rebecca A Seguin-FowlerInstitute for Advancing Health through Agriculture, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX.

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006374NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis meta-ethnography aimed to examine and thematically analyze relevant qualitative studies to create a nutrition security conceptual framework.

designFollowing the 7-step process for a meta-ethnography, we screened 6,831 studies and included eligible papers relating to nutrition security.

settingUS-based studies.

participants2,709 participants in 58 qualitative papers reviewed. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Nutrition security.

interventionNot applicable. ANALYSIS: Two researchers independently read and extracted data from each paper. This information was then combined, and 2 investigators generated themes to determine critical constructs of nutrition security. Constructs were then combined into a conceptual model.

resultsThe final conceptual framework includes 2 primary constructs (environmental circumstances and psychosocial functioning), 16 secondary constructs, and 51 tertiary constructs of nutrition security. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This is the first meta-ethnography to focus on concepts related to nutrition security rather than food security. There is an overlap between our findings and the existing framework for food security, including the 6 pillars of food security and the 5 domains of food access. An improved understanding of nutrition security and the proposed conceptual framework established will help guide the development of improved nutrition security measures and interventions to improve diet quality and overall health.

Indexed as

Food SecurityAnthropology, CulturalHumansQualitative Researchconceptual frameworkdiet qualityfood securitymeta-ethnographynutrition security

Identifiers

PMID40054965
PMCPMC13608884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.