SynthesisAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Radiation Dose Reduction Studies in Pediatric Head CT.
Synthesis in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An in-house fabricated patient-specific pediatric head CT phantom for trauma-oriented emergency imaging: two-scanner validation and expert reader assessment.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Radiation dose of computed tomography in pediatric head trauma imaging.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Imaging Modalities in Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Proposal of the ARCANA Protocol for Multimodal Radiation-Free Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional imaging protocols used in pediatric head CT scanning without specific adaptations to lower radiation dose or "standard dose" pediatric head CTs increase unnecessary radiation exposure. Modifying CT parameters, utilizing iterative reconstruction, and adopting specialized protocols are ongoing strategies to lower radiation dose in pediatric head CTs. PURPOSE: This article reviews studies reducing radiation exposure in pediatric patients undergoing head CT and provides meta-analysis of percent radiation dose reduction of the studies. DATA SOURCES: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we utilized EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Clinicaltrials.gov to identify all relevant articles pertaining to radiation dose reduction in pediatric head CT. STUDY SELECTION: All human studies (excluding animal, phantom, and cadaveric) published after 2012 aiming to lower radiation dose of a "routine" or "standard" dose CT protocol in use were selected for review. DATA ANALYSIS: We extracted study characteristics such as location, sample size, scanner, clinical indication, CT protocol parameter modifications, iterative reconstruction method if applicable, dose reduction, image quality metrics, and overall findings. CT protocol parameter modifications and dose reduction were summarized by using descriptive statistics. Meta-analyses on percent dose reduction were performed. Meta-analyses were subgrouped by clinical indication, use of iterative reconstruction, and age group to isolate sources of heterogeneity between studies. Limitations included heterogeneity of study protocols, incomplete protocol/outcome reporting, and variability of institution, scanner, patient demographics. Clinical indication limits the generalizability of our findings. DATA SYNTHESIS: This review identified 20 studies modifying their routine or standard dose pediatric head CT protocols on human patients. These studies modified CT parameters with or without the use of iterative reconstruction and/or used specialized protocols. Most common CT parameters modifications consisted of decreasing tube current time product (mAs) ( LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity of study protocols, incomplete protocol/outcome reporting, and variability of institution, scanner, patient demographics, and clinical indication limit the generalizability of our findings.
conclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis identifies tube current time product as the most commonly modified CT parameter and also highlights CT clinical indication as an important factor to isolate when comparing dose reduction studies. Further research should further investigate iterative reconstruction techniques as well as photon-counting CT to maximize radiation dose reduction of pediatric head CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.