Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40054871›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Factors influencing prosthesis selection and variation: a survey of orthopaedic surgeons in Australia.

Michelle J Allen, David Brain, Ross Crawford, Sameera Senanayake, Ian A Harris, Lana M Elliott, Reece Hinchcliff, Victoria McCreanor, Steven M McPhail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michelle J AllenAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia m27.allen@qut.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2178-4054
David BrainAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6612-348X
Ross CrawfordFaculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Sameera SenanayakeAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ian A HarrisIngham Institute, University of New South Wales, South Western Sydney Clinical School, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-7627
Lana M ElliottAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0228-6957
Reece HinchcliffAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Victoria McCreanorAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0589-8521
Steven M McPhailAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing demand for knee and hip arthroplasty with considerable health system cost implications. Despite the high surgical costs relating to the prosthesis used, little is known about which factors are most influential in prosthesis choice, nor is it clear what level of variation may be warranted for clinical reasons.

objectivesThis study had dual objectives: (1) identify factors influencing prosthesis selection for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and (2) develop a working definition for unwarranted variation in THA and TKA implant selection.

designA three-stage prospective study: (1) develop and pilot a questionnaire with input from orthopaedic surgeons; (2) a cross-sectional survey with orthopaedic surgeons across Australia and (3) an expert panel to finalise the working definition of unwarranted variation. SETTING AND

participantsStudy activities were conducted both virtually and in person, primarily with hospital-based orthopaedic surgeons and orthopaedic registrars across Australia, but also included health economists and health administrators in the expert panel stage.

resultsRevision rates, familiarity with an implant and implant quality were prioritised when choosing a prosthesis, while other factors, including cost, were reported to have limited influence. Technological advancement and revision rates were influential for past changes in prostheses, and strong clinical evidence is expected to precede future changes. The consensus was reached on a working definition of unwarranted variation that focused on implants with revision rates of 20% or higher compared with published benchmarks. The use of multiple cost thresholds was recommended for defining narrow and broad definitions of unwarranted variation.

conclusionStudy findings provide valuable insights into the decision-making process for prosthesis selection, as well as what surgeons believe might constitute unwarranted variation. This information can advance our understanding of the magnitude and impact of unwarranted variation in prosthesis selection, as well as inform strategies to address it.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHip ProsthesisKnee ProsthesisOrthopedic SurgeonsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesReoperationSurveys and QuestionnairesDecision MakingHEALTH ECONOMICSHipKneeORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERY

Identifiers

PMID40054871
PMCPMC11891528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.