Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40054605›Full record

ArticleAnnals of vascular surgery2025

Trainee Perception of Virtual Interviews and Associations of Virtual Engagement with Vascular Surgery Culture and Community.

Margaret A Reilly, Christina L Cui, Leanne E Grafmuller, Joshua S Eng, Eric B Pillado, Ruojia Debbie Li, Kathryn L DiLosa, Allan M Conway, Guillermo A Escobar, Palma M Shaw and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of vascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Margaret A ReillyDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Christina L CuiDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Leanne E GrafmullerDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Joshua S EngSurgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Eric B PilladoDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Ruojia Debbie LiDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL.
Kathryn L DiLosaDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA.
Allan M ConwayDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Guillermo A EscobarDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Palma M ShawDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.
Yue-Yung HuDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Karl Y BilimoriaDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Malachi G SheahanDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA.
Dawn M ColemanDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC. Electronic address: dawn.coleman@duke.edu.

Funding

Vascular Surgery Scientist Training ProgramT32HL094293 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ESKANDARI, MARK K · 2009 to 2023
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL094293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the vascular surgery community has increased the utilization of virtual interviews and virtual engagement or use of online technologies for educational, networking, and mentorship activities. This study evaluates trainee preferences of virtual interviews and associations of virtual engagement with wellness.

methodsDeidentified data were collected from a confidential, voluntary survey of residents and fellows in vascular surgery programs administered following the 2023 Vascular Surgery In-Training Examination (VSITE). A 5-point Likert scale measured resident perceptions of virtual interviews and virtual interactions. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to compare factors associated with preference of virtual interviews and virtual engagement.

resultsOf 521 trainees who participated in the survey (78.2% response rate), 60.8% were male, 48.8% were non-White, and there was a relatively equal distribution among training years. Only 41.2% of the trainees reported they would have preferred virtual interviews in retrospect. These trainees were more likely to be non-White and in postgraduate years one or 2 (P = 0.03 and P < 0.001, respectively). Overall, 83.5% of trainees were classified as virtually engaged. These trainees were more likely to be male (86.5% vs. 78.9%, P = 0.033) and had 2.8 increased odds of satisfaction with time for their personal lives (P < 0.001).

conclusionWhile most trainees surveyed reported a preference for in-person interviews, trainees report that virtual interviews are reflective of program culture. Additionally, trainees who were virtually engaged were more likely to report satisfaction with their time for their personal lives. Our study supports continued hybrid approaches to interviews and trainee engagement.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEducation, Medical, GraduateInternship and ResidencyInterviews as TopicSurgeonsVascular Surgical ProceduresAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMentorsOrganizational CulturePerceptionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40054605
PMCPMC12034471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.