ArticleCell reports. Medicine2025
Self-assembled patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters for personalized drug testing in diverse sarcomas.
Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Organoids, organ-on-a-chip, and microtumors: Biomimetic 3D tumor models advancing drug development and precision medicine.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Exploring Dacarbazine Complexation with a Cellobiose-Based Carrier: A Multimethod Theoretical, NMR, and Thermochemical Study.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional bioprinting of patient-derived Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a novel platform for precision oncology and drug response profiling.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Personalizing colorectal Cancer treatment: Chemotherapy drug testing with patient-derived tumor cell clusters.Translational oncology · 2025Article
- Functional Assays to Guide Personalized Oncological Treatment of Patients with Soft-Tissue Sarcomas.Cancers · 2025Review
- Establishment of patient-derived 3D in vitro models of sarcomas: literature review and guidelines on behalf of the FORTRESS working group.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Evaluating Theoretical Solvent Models for Thermodynamic and Structural Descriptions of Dacarbazine-Cyclodextrin Complexes. The Theoretical and Conductometric Study.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recent trend on sarcoma stem cell reprogramming towards study of disease progression: A systematic review.Journal of stem cells & regenerative medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several patient-derived tumor models have emerged recently. However, soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) present a challenge in developing preclinical drug-testing models due to their non-epithelial and complex nature. Here, we report a model termed patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters (PTCs) derived from STS patients. PTCs result from the self-assembly and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), epithelial cells, and immune cells, faithfully recapitulating the morphology and function of the original tumors. Through standardized culture and drug-response assessment protocols, PTCs facilitate personalized drug testing, evaluating hundreds of therapies within two weeks. Notably, PTCs exhibit 100% accuracy in distinguishing between complete or partial response and disease progression. We demonstrate the utility of PTCs in guiding chemotherapy selection for a patient with relapse and metastases following conventional therapy, who exhibited a positive response after non-conventional therapy identified through PTC. These findings underscore the potential of PTCs for prospective use in clinical decision-making regarding therapy selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.