ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2025
Sustainable extraction of phytochemicals from Mentha arvensis using supramolecular eutectic solvent via microwave Irradiation: Unveiling insights with CatBoost-Driven feature analysis.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-assisted extraction for enhanced recovery and bioactivity of polyphenols from Tuber formosanum.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Simultaneous ultrasound-microwave assisted deep eutectic solvent extraction of essential oil from calamansi (Citrus × microcarpa) peel: optimization, volatile profiling, and antioxidant activities.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study revealed the higher extraction potential of sustainable choline chloride (ChCl) and ethylene glycol (EG) based deep eutectic solvent (DES) from Mentha arvensis via microwave irradiation. The categorical boosting (CatBoost) machine learning model was applied to optimize the extraction process against time (4-8 min), microwave power (160-320 W), and biomass quantity (1-2.0 g/10 mL) with DES. The experimentally optimized TPC 124 ± 4.0 mg GAE/g, TFC 79 ± 3.0 mg QE/g, and DPPH radical inhibition 90 ± 4.0 % evaluated in 6 min at 240 W with 1.0 g biomass. The lowest average relative errors of 0.402 % (TPC), 0.863 % (TFC), and 0.597 % (DPPH) for train and 0.679 % (TPC), 0.685 % (TFC) and 0.480 % (DPPH) for test data showed the consistency with the predicted values. The partial dependence and feature importance revealed the contributing impact of parameters for optimizing the extraction. The average contribution percentage of each predictor to the responses revealed that time contributed 32.5 % (TPC), 35.9 % (TFC), and 18.6 % (DPPH); microwave power contributed 26.7 % (TPC), 25.5 % (TFC), and 44.2 % (DPPH); while biomass contributed 40.8 % (TPC), 38.6 % (TFC), and 37.2 % (DPPH). The significant antibacterial (S. aureus = 25.5 ± 1.4 mm and E. coli = 23.5 ± 1.4 mm) with MICs (S. aureus = 50 ± 2.5 µg/mL and E. coli = 100 ± 1.5 µg/mL) and antifungal potential (F. solani = 22.5 ± 1.4 mm, A. niger = 23.5 ± 0.8 mm), with MIC (F. solani = 100 ± 0.4 µg/mL and A. niger = 50 ± 0.5 µg/mL) of optimized extracts recorded by DES. The DES would be the best alternative to traditional organic solvents based on higher extraction efficiency and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.