Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40053933›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery2025

Deep learning-based segmentation of the trigeminal nerve and surrounding vasculature in trigeminal neuralgia.

Kyra M Halbert-Elliott, Michael E Xie, Bryan Dong, Oishika Das, Xihang Wang, Christopher M Jackson, Michael Lim, Judy Huang, Vivek S Yedavalli, Chetan Bettegowda and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kyra M Halbert-Elliott *Departments of1Neurosurgery and.
Michael E Xie *Departments of1Neurosurgery and.
Bryan DongDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Oishika DasDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Xihang WangDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Christopher M JacksonDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Michael Lim3Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Judy HuangDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Vivek S Yedavalli2Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Chetan BettegowdaDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Risheng XuDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM136577 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANDREA L COX · 2020 to 2026
$13.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePreoperative workup of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) consists of identification of neurovascular features on MRI. In this study, the authors apply and evaluate the performance of deep learning models for segmentation of the trigeminal nerve and surrounding vasculature to quantify anatomical features of the nerve and vessels.

methodsSix U-Net-based neural networks, each with a different encoder backbone, were trained to label constructive interference in steady-state MRI voxels as nerve, vasculature, or background. A retrospective dataset of 50 TN patients at the authors' institution who underwent preoperative high-resolution MRI in 2022 was utilized to train and test the models. Performance was measured by the Dice coefficient and intersection over union (IoU) metrics. Anatomical characteristics, such as surface area of neurovascular contact and distance to the contact point, were computed and compared between the predicted and ground truth segmentations.

resultsOf the evaluated models, the best performing was U-Net with an SE-ResNet50 backbone (Dice score = 0.775 ± 0.015, IoU score = 0.681 ± 0.015). When the SE-ResNet50 backbone was used, the average surface area of neurovascular contact in the testing dataset was 6.90 mm2, which was not significantly different from the surface area calculated from manual segmentation (p = 0.83). The average calculated distance from the brainstem to the contact point was 4.34 mm, which was also not significantly different from manual segmentation (p = 0.29).

conclusionsU-Net-based neural networks perform well for segmenting trigeminal nerve and vessels from preoperative MRI volumes. This technology enables the development of quantitative and objective metrics for radiographic evaluation of TN.

Indexed as

Deep LearningTrigeminal NerveTrigeminal NeuralgiaAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective Studiesdeep learningfunctional neurosurgerymicrovascular decompressionneuroradiologypainsegmentationtrigeminal neuralgia

Identifiers

PMID40053933
PMCPMC12213155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.