ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2025
A case of intraoperative arrest & mobile ECMO.
Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past two decades, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly used to support critical patients with cardiac and respiratory failure who fail to respond to conventional management. In refractory cardiac arrest, ECMO can restore perfusion in patients who meet specific criteria designed to maximize survival benefit and good neurological outcomes. In recent literature, there is no report of mobile ECMO in a case of prolonged cardiac arrest with direct cardiac massage. We describe our experience with a 34-year-old man with multiple traumatic injuries following a motor vehicle collision. He was treated in a trauma center hospital in the same city as our center. He was initially in stable condition (spontaneous ventilation with FiO2 0.21, no vasoactive drugs, Glasgow 15, no acute kidney injury or other organ dysfunction). One week after admission, a retained left hemopneumothorax required surgical intervention, as previous drainage was ineffective. Computed tomography imaging was also concerning for parencyhmal injury by the thoracotomy tube. Intraoperatively, when the patient was placed in lateral position, he experienced cardiac arrest, presumed to be secondary to pulmonary embolism. After 18 min, we were asked to rescue this patient with ECMO, as he had no contraindications to support. After 81 min of advanced life support, including direct cardiac massage, return of spontaneous circulation was achieved seconds after ECMO was initiated. He was then transported to our hospital. The patient achieved a favorable neurological outcome (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 at 24 h) and was discharged after a 2 month stay. This case highlights the potential benefits of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation and ECMO in patients with refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest. In this case, proper ACLS and CPR allowed time for mobile ECMO support to be initiated from a remote center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.