Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40053854›Full record

ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2025

Development and validation of a checklist for cardiopulmonary bypass.

Valdir Assis Dos Reis Filho, Karina Aparecida Antonelli Novello, Mariana Leticia Matias

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. National Heart Center Perfusion Guidelines.Saudi medical journal · 2026
    Guideline
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valdir Assis Dos Reis FilhoDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Av. Dr. Dante Pazzanese, 500 - Vila Mariana, São Paulo - SP, 04012-909, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6486-0040
Karina Aparecida Antonelli NovelloDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Av. Dr. Dante Pazzanese, 500 - Vila Mariana, São Paulo - SP, 04012-909, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1367-1869
Mariana Leticia MatiasDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Av. Dr. Dante Pazzanese, 500 - Vila Mariana, São Paulo - SP, 04012-909, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7174-3336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRisk prevention protocols related to patient care have been developed to reduce the incidence of adverse events in health care services. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can trigger several complications, including physiological problems, electrical, mechanical, and human failures, or defective components. In order to promote patient safety and the identification of failures before they can cause damage, it is necessary to the use of a checklist for all surgeries.

objectiveTo prepare and validate a checklist for cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODOLOGY: A consensus validation methodology is applied in this study, in which the Delphi technique was structured for the instrument's development. Five perfusion experts, with at least five years of experience, had an active participation in this research. First, a questionnaire was structured, based on a comprehensive review of the relevant literature. Then, two rounds of assessments were conducted, allowing for the collection of experts' opinions.

resultsIn the first moment, a 42-item list was prepared and sent to the five experts for analysis. Based on participant's responses, certain elements were accepted, excluded, and suggested. After that, a second 37-item list was assessed by the experts, resulting in all 37 items having an average assessment of ≥4 and a standard deviation ≤1.0 of acceptance. Based on these results, a 41-element checklist was developed, and these elements were considered crucial and relevant for the concerned analysis.

conclusionThe use of specific checklists for cardiopulmonary bypass comes into view as a highly proficient strategy, capable of promoting substantial improvements in the procedure safety and quality. The implementation and approval of this checklist should be considered.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary BypassChecklistDelphi TechniqueHumansPatient SafetyReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCardiopulmonary bypassChecklistPatient safety

Identifiers

PMID40053854
PMCPMC11888589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.