ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2025
Development and validation of a checklist for cardiopulmonary bypass.
Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- National Heart Center Perfusion Guidelines.Saudi medical journal · 2026Guideline
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRisk prevention protocols related to patient care have been developed to reduce the incidence of adverse events in health care services. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can trigger several complications, including physiological problems, electrical, mechanical, and human failures, or defective components. In order to promote patient safety and the identification of failures before they can cause damage, it is necessary to the use of a checklist for all surgeries.
objectiveTo prepare and validate a checklist for cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODOLOGY: A consensus validation methodology is applied in this study, in which the Delphi technique was structured for the instrument's development. Five perfusion experts, with at least five years of experience, had an active participation in this research. First, a questionnaire was structured, based on a comprehensive review of the relevant literature. Then, two rounds of assessments were conducted, allowing for the collection of experts' opinions.
resultsIn the first moment, a 42-item list was prepared and sent to the five experts for analysis. Based on participant's responses, certain elements were accepted, excluded, and suggested. After that, a second 37-item list was assessed by the experts, resulting in all 37 items having an average assessment of ≥4 and a standard deviation ≤1.0 of acceptance. Based on these results, a 41-element checklist was developed, and these elements were considered crucial and relevant for the concerned analysis.
conclusionThe use of specific checklists for cardiopulmonary bypass comes into view as a highly proficient strategy, capable of promoting substantial improvements in the procedure safety and quality. The implementation and approval of this checklist should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.