Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40053788›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Testing a Dashboard Intervention for Tracking Digital Social Media Activity in Clinical Care of Individuals With Mood and Anxiety Disorders: Protocol and Design Considerations for a Pragmatic Randomized Trial.

Brittany Nesbitt, Danielle Virgadamo, Carlos Aguirre, Matthew DeCamp, Mark Dredze, Keith Harrigian, Tenzin Lhaksampa, Jennifer M Meuchel, Aja M Meyer, Alex Walker and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03925038 (The Use of Electronic Communications-based Automated Technologies to Augment Traditional Mental Health Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03925038 nacompletednot on this map

The Use of Electronic Communications-based Automated Technologies to Augment Traditional Mental Health Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2019 to 2024Enrolled103ConditionsDepressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Bipolar Affective DisorderArmsAugmented Care: Electronic Media Dashboard, Treatment as Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Brittany Nesbitt *Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-5821-6560
Danielle Virgadamo *Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-6366-9115
Carlos AguirreWhiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3570-2032
Matthew DeCampUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9371-8729
Mark DredzeWhiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0422-2474
Keith HarrigianWhiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9483-8469
Tenzin LhaksampaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1272-1329
Jennifer M MeuchelJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5648-5973
Aja M MeyerJohns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-9084-6895
Alex WalkerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0522-3719
Ayah ZiriklyWhiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8441-1741
Margaret S ChisolmJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7424-919X
Peter P ZandiJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8423-2623
Leslie MillerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9199-1174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMood and anxiety disorders are prevalent mental health diagnoses. Numerous studies have shown that measurement-based care, which is used to monitor patient symptoms, functioning, and treatment progress and help guide clinical decisions and collaboration on treatment goals, can improve outcomes in patients with these disorders. Including digital information regarding patients' electronic communications and social media activity is an innovative approach to augmenting measurement-based care. Recent data indicate interest and willingness from both mental health clinicians and patients to share this type of digital information in treatment sessions. However, the clinical benefit of systematically doing this has been minimally evaluated.

objectiveThis study aims to develop an electronic dashboard for tracking patients' digital social activity and a protocol for a pragmatic randomized trial to test the feasibility and efficacy of using the dashboard in real-world clinical care of patients with depression or anxiety disorders.

methodsWe developed a personalized electronic dashboard that tracks patients' electronic communications and social media activity, visualizes data on these interactions through key graphics and figures, and provides a tool that can be readily integrated into routine clinical care for use by clinicians and patients during treatment sessions. We then designed a randomized trial to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using the electronic dashboard in real-world care compared to treatment as usual. The trial included patients aged ≥12 years with a mood or anxiety disorder who were receiving treatment in outpatient psychiatry clinics in the Johns Hopkins Health System and the Kennedy Krieger Institute. The primary outcome includes changes in patient-rated depression symptoms. Secondary outcomes include changes in patient-rated anxiety symptoms and overall functioning. Exploratory analyses examine the impact of the intervention on measures of therapeutic alliance and the detection of clinically actionable targets.

resultsWe successfully developed an electronic dashboard for tracking patients' electronic communications and social media activity, and we implemented a protocol for evaluating the feasibility and efficacy of using the dashboard in routine care for mood or anxiety disorders. The protocol was approved by the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board. In this study, we report the technological, ethical, and pragmatic considerations in developing the dashboard and testing it in a real-world setting.

conclusionsThe integration of an electronic dashboard to monitor digital social activity in mental health care treatment is novel. This study examines the feasibility and effectiveness of the dashboard and the challenges in implementing this protocol. The lessons learned from developing and implementing the study will inform ongoing discussions about the value of gathering collateral information on patients' digital social activity and how to do so in a way that is acceptable and clinically effective.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03925038; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03925038. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/63279.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersMood DisordersSocial MediaAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePragmatic Clinical Trials as Topicanxietydashboardsdepressiondigital mental healthelectronic communicationmeasurement-based caremental healthpersonal health informationpsychiatrysocial media

Identifiers

PMID40053788
PMCPMC11923457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.